Why I'm Seeing Ads for Giant Salamanders (and Carly F)

Salamanders.png

I mentioned yesterday my surprise at seeing an ad for the California Senate race -- specifically, an attack ad on Barbara Boxer from a "Protect Life" group -- when I was checking out a Spanish-language news site based in Paraguay. Plus an English-language ad for giant salamanders, left. The explanation for at least the Carly ad turned out to be that the Paraguayan ad-server detected that I was coming in from California and so delivered a relevant commercial.

A reader quickly responded that, in fact, most online users like me were true naifs about the extent of ever-evolving profiles of our online identities. He writes:

Around 8 years ago, I started a company in the Internet advertising industry. In the last 8 years, the one constant has been the growth in how much we know about you and all the other Internet surfers out there. It used to be that we could just map your ip address to a location and tell what time of the day it was. Then we started getting some demographic information like age and gender. These days there has been an explosion of data, to name just a few:

- Look alike data: Other web surfers with similar surfing habits like yours are known to perform activities A, B and C, therefore you are likely to do so too.
- Behavioral data: You recently researched a Honda Accord so perhaps we should show you ads for Toyota Camry
- Social data: You share these interests and therefore are perhaps interested in these products. Your friends share these interests, so perhaps you might be interested in them too.
- Offline data: Your credit score, your zipcode (of where you live rather than where you are at this moment), the wealth percentile of your household... Contextual data: Deep, real time contextual information about the page you are on at this moment.

All of this data is anonymous, so it's not a privacy risk (at least not yet), but it is scary how much data is out there. What is scarier is how much data is out there that nobody (at least not officially for moral/PR reasons) is using yet. Depending on the type of the data, this data is usually auctioned off to the highest bidder in real time or shipped to any one who asks for a fee.

Agencies then craft campaigns that pull together various combinations of these targeting criteria to decide whom to target with which ad and how. Companies like mine excel at using huge mounds of this data to model advertiser performance (dollars spent versus revenue generated) to ensure that every ad that is shown has the maximum impact on advertiser top line/bottom line.

My guess is that the industry has just got started.

I wrote back asking, But what about the giant salamander? And after the jump, the explanation -- along with another reader's experience with ads showing up in unexpected venues.

____
Why ads for giant salamanders? The reader quoted above, whose incoming message had the subject line "If you only knew how well we target you," replies:

Ah yes, the danger of all this precise targeting and optimization is that you might quickly run out of ads to show and have to resort to the cheapest ads (the Japanese Salamander ad probably cost a penny CPM). There's further nuance, it is quite likely that since you were traveling from the east coast, most of the data about you were stashed on servers on the east coast and none of that could make it across the country in time to target you more precisely. Regular advertising will resume when you return to your home coast!

Another reader, with an Indian name, writes about a similar experience:

I see this all the time with Indian, British and Pakistani papers, although not with political ads.

And in terms of the Indians/Pakistani papers, with the exchange rate, they have to be earning some serious cash on this, because of the exchange rate. Click through might be low but one impression could be worth 100x a local impression. I've always wondered where money flows like this factor into international statistics. An online friend told me EVEOnline, the game, accounts for something like 1/3 of Iceland's export earnings, although, like everything I read online, that comes with a grain of salt attached.
Presented by

James Fallows is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and has written for the magazine since the late 1970s. He has reported extensively from outside the United States and once worked as President Carter's chief speechwriter. His latest book is China Airborne. More

James Fallows is based in Washington as a national correspondent for The Atlantic. He has worked for the magazine for nearly 30 years and in that time has also lived in Seattle, Berkeley, Austin, Tokyo, Kuala Lumpur, Shanghai, and Beijing. He was raised in Redlands, California, received his undergraduate degree in American history and literature from Harvard, and received a graduate degree in economics from Oxford as a Rhodes scholar. In addition to working for The Atlantic, he has spent two years as chief White House speechwriter for Jimmy Carter, two years as the editor of US News & World Report, and six months as a program designer at Microsoft. He is an instrument-rated private pilot. He is also now the chair in U.S. media at the U.S. Studies Centre at the University of Sydney, in Australia.

Fallows has been a finalist for the National Magazine Award five times and has won once; he has also won the American Book Award for nonfiction and a N.Y. Emmy award for the documentary series Doing Business in China. He was the founding chairman of the New America Foundation. His recent books Blind Into Baghdad (2006) and Postcards From Tomorrow Square (2009) are based on his writings for The Atlantic. His latest book is China Airborne. He is married to Deborah Fallows, author of the recent book Dreaming in Chinese. They have two married sons.

Fallows welcomes and frequently quotes from reader mail sent via the "Email" button below. Unless you specify otherwise, we consider any incoming mail available for possible quotation -- but not with the sender's real name unless you explicitly state that it may be used. If you are wondering why Fallows does not use a "Comments" field below his posts, please see previous explanations here and here.

Saving the Bees

Honeybees contribute more than $15 billion to the U.S. economy. A short documentary considers how desperate beekeepers are trying to keep their hives alive.

Video

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.

Video

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Video

The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.

Video

Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.

Video

Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Technology

From This Author

Just In