Reining in Facebook

Online privacy advocates are getting some high-profile support.

This weekend, Senator Chuck Schumer asked the Federal Trade Commission to create  guidelines for how user information is shared by online social networks. A bill with similar privacy-protecting goals was introduced in the House on Thursday.

The moves follow an ambitious attempt by Facebook to extend its reach over the Web, which has raised a new round of privacy concerns. But Facebook isn't alone. Blippy, a startup which allows users to share their purchasing histories online, apologized today for inadvertently making available users' credit card numbers and, last month, Google received flak from an FTC commissioner over how it handled privacy when unveiling its Buzz social network.

Schumer's recommendations to the FTC include encouraging social networks to let users opt in to privacy changes rather than forcing them to opt out. Facebook chose the latter route for its recent changes, forcing users to navigate a complicated process to undo them. (Here's a guide to doing so and a Facebook privacy primer.) Spammers and scammers could also solicit unsuspecting users by using data made available by the social network, Schumer said: "There are lots of things that you may have never wanted to go beyond your family and friends but do."

bill introduced on Thursday by Michigan Rep. Thaddeus McCotter would give citizens better control over that information by forcing sites to remove publicly available information at a user's request. Despite the noble goal, the roughly 300-word document that features a typo in its first line "suffers from some vague language that seemingly opens the door for abuse," wrote Ars Technica's Jacqui Cheng. The Cato Institute's Jim Harper imagines one way the bill could be misused: rabble-rousing users who post false information under various guises in order to overwhelm webmasters with subsequent take-down requests. Nothing good can be said of the bill, writes Thomas O'Toole at TechLaw, "except for the fact that there is little chance it will be enacted into law."

For its part, Facebook has stepped up its lobbying efforts with privacy topping the agenda, according to VentureBeat's Kim-Mai Cutler, who spoke with a company spokesman. As privacy concerns escalate, the company is positioning itself well, Cutler writes:

Even though the company says its role in D.C. is about awareness for now, developing these relationships will help Facebook get ahead of and influence legislation that may curb its ad targeting abilities.
Presented by

Niraj Chokshi is a former staff editor at, where he wrote about technology. He is currently freelancing and can be reached through his personal website, More

Niraj previously reported on the business of the nation's largest law firms for The Recorder, a San Francisco legal newspaper. He has also been published in The Hartford Courant, The Seattle Times and The Age, in Melbourne, Australia. He's also a longtime programmer and sometimes website designer.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus


Confessions of Moms Around the World

A global look at the hardest and best job ever


A Stop-Motion Tour of New York City

A filmmaker animated hundreds of still photographs to create this Big Apple flip book


The Absurd Psychology of Restaurant Menus

Would people eat healthier if celery was called "cool celery?"


This Japanese Inn Has Been Open for 1,300 Years

It's one of the oldest family businesses in the world.

More in Technology

Just In