Legislating the Science Curriculum

Mandatory equal time for climate change skepticism? A front-page story in The New York Times on moves by some state legislators has drawn over a thousand comments, among the more highly recommended by readers:

United States of Embarrassment! As China continues to grow and become the global power, American politicians are taking the country backwards.

Empires fall largely due to the structural and social problems within. We have only ourselves to blame for becoming a Banana Republic.

Speaking of empires, though, instruction in Marxist-Leninist philosophy is still mandatory in Chinese schools, even if members of the nation's Politburo, let alone the new generation of students, no longer believe in it. (See this 2007 article from the Los Angeles Times.)

Over fifty years ago, former Soviet students who had also been force-fed communist doctrine -- which for a while included Lysenkoism! -- shocked America with Sputnik, manned spacecraft, and nuclear weapons. As my colleague and former teacher Charles Gillispie once noted in The New York Times Book Review, how this was possible is a mystery, except that "the support of the state was even mightier than its grip."

Dogmatism may have even helped Russian education. The more poorly politics and the economy were managed, the more attractive science teaching and research, relatively if incompletely insulated, became for the most brilliant students. The high-school science magazine Kvant, founded in 1970, was outstanding. Emigrating former Soviet scientists were coveted by universities in the U.S., Israel, and other countries.

Legislative mandates can be used creatively. You can teach both sides of an issue while letting the strength of evidence speak for itself. It may not even matter if you teach only one side. Charles Darwin's own mentor, the brilliant Cambridge naturalist John Stevens Henslow, was an ordained Church of England cleric who believed firmly in the stability of species.

Conservatives and liberals are equally mistaken in believing that the schools have some magic leverage over issues that must be resolved elsewhere.

Presented by

Edward Tenner is a historian of technology and culture, and an affiliate of the Center for Arts and Cultural Policy at Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School. He was a founding advisor of Smithsonian's Lemelson Center.

Why Is Google Making Human Skin?

Hidden away on Google’s campus, doctors at a world-class life sciences lab are trying to change the way people think about their health.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Videos

Why Is Google Making Human Skin?

Hidden away on Google’s campus, doctors are changing the way people think about health.

Video

How to Build a Tornado

A Canadian inventor believes his tornado machine could solve the world's energy crisis.

Video

A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This short film takes you on a whirling tour of the Big Apple

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

Video

The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in Technology

From This Author

Just In