Skip Navigation
James Fallows

James Fallows - James Fallows is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and has written for the magazine since the late 1970s. He has reported extensively from outside the United States, and once worked as President Carter's chief speechwriter. His latest book, China Airborne, will be published in May.
More

James Fallows is based in Washington as a national correspondent for The Atlantic. He has worked for the magazine for nearly 30 years and in that time has also lived in Seattle, Berkeley, Austin, Tokyo, Kuala Lumpur, Shanghai, and Beijing. He was raised in Redlands, California, received his undergraduate degree in American history and literature from Harvard, and received a graduate degree in economics from Oxford as a Rhodes scholar. In addition to working for The Atlantic, he has spent two years as chief White House speechwriter for Jimmy Carter, two years as the editor of US News & World Report, and six months as a program designer at Microsoft. He is an instrument-rated private pilot. He is also now the chair in U.S. media at the US Studies Centre at the University of Sydney, in Australia.

Fallows has been a finalist for the National Magazine Award five times and has won once; he has also won the American Book Award for nonfiction and a N.Y. Emmy award for the documentary series Doing Business in China. He was the founding chairman of the New America Foundation. His two most recent books, Blind Into Baghdad (2006) and Postcards From Tomorrow Square (2009), are based on his writings for The Atlantic; he is at work on another book about China. He is married to Deborah Fallows, author of the recent book Dreaming in Chinese. They have two married sons.

Fallows welcomes and frequently quotes from reader mail sent via the "Email" button below. Unless you specify otherwise, we consider any incoming mail available for possible quotation -- but not with the sender's real name unless you explicitly state that it may be used. If you are wondering why Fallows does not use a "Comments" field below his posts, please see previous explanations here and here.

Sounds of silence, part 1

By James Fallows
Mar 18 2009, 4:49 PM ET

I noted recently that you could go surprisingly far as an interviewer simply by sitting quietly and forcing the other person to break the silence. (Yes, I do realize that this is at odds with my previous endorsement of the Jon Stewart / David Frost interview approach. Different circumstances, different styles.) A very large number of very interesting replies have come in, most to the effect of, "You don't know the half of it!"

I will parcel them out from time to time. This initial installment has two. The first is from a former college professor of mine who later had a senior Congressional staff role. Then, discreetly after the jump, a dispatch from Tony Comstock, director of erotic films.

My former professor:
[This is] a very good point about interviewing techniques. People want to fill the void, often by digging themselves deeper in the process. I've also seen it work when politicians are in meetings with supplicants. Time and again, one or more of my Senate bosses would let the guests talk, nodding at appropriate points, and time would run out before they ever reached the key question, "Will you support/will you make a call/ will you act now...?" Many often seemed afraid to ask directly for what they wanted. And we avoided premature commitments in the process.
____
The film director:


 I just read your post with more than passing interest!

I never do adversarial interviews; not in my erotic films, not in my "good cause" docs either. The only time I use (quasi) adversarial techniques is when I feel like a person is over- prepared and they're giving me (usually well-intentioned) spin instead of honest testimony. That sometimes happens with people who are accustomed to speaking in  front of other people (teachers, politicians, business leaders, clergy) and I find I have to "trick" them into letting their guard down and speaking from the heart.

But on occasion I do use the stretched silence; not with the over prepared, but with everyday people; and not to indicate boredom, but to communicate fascination, even reverence.

When some one is close to opening up, but not quite there, I'll pick a  moment to let something hang, and then lean in and make strong, but  non-threatening eye contact -- "I want to hear more, and it's safe for you to tell me."

As you might imagine, when a couple has just allowed us to document  their lovemaking, there is an opportunity to hear amazing testimony,  if the space for that testimony is created in a gentle and generous way. The "stretched silence" is one of the ways I try to make that happen!

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

What Matters in President Obama's 2013 Budget What Matters in President Obama's 2013 Budget
We Don't Need a Digital sabbath, We Need More Time You Don't Need a Break From Technology
A Hauntingly Beautiful Zombie Love Story A Beautiful Zombie Love Story
The GOP Primary Is Badly Wounding Mitt Romney Why a Long Primary Fight Will Hurt Mitt Romney
Will the Developing World Be Mobile First or Mobile Forever? The Developing World and Mobile Tech
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
President Obama reflects on what Lincoln means to him and to America, in an introduction to our special issue. Read more ›

Just In

View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Valentine's Day 2012

Feb 14, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

James Fallows
from the Magazine

Obama, Explained

As Barack Obama contends for a second term in office, two conflicting narratives of his presidency…

Barack Obama

Facing huge risks and holding inconclusive intel, the president makes a gutsy call to take out bin…

Hacked!

As email, documents, and almost every aspect of our professional and personal lives moves onto the…