Skip Navigation
James Fallows

James Fallows - James Fallows is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and has written for the magazine since the late 1970s. He has reported extensively from outside the United States, and once worked as President Carter's chief speechwriter. His latest book, China Airborne, was published in early May.
More

James Fallows is based in Washington as a national correspondent for The Atlantic. He has worked for the magazine for nearly 30 years and in that time has also lived in Seattle, Berkeley, Austin, Tokyo, Kuala Lumpur, Shanghai, and Beijing. He was raised in Redlands, California, received his undergraduate degree in American history and literature from Harvard, and received a graduate degree in economics from Oxford as a Rhodes scholar. In addition to working for The Atlantic, he has spent two years as chief White House speechwriter for Jimmy Carter, two years as the editor of US News & World Report, and six months as a program designer at Microsoft. He is an instrument-rated private pilot. He is also now the chair in U.S. media at the US Studies Centre at the University of Sydney, in Australia.

Fallows has been a finalist for the National Magazine Award five times and has won once; he has also won the American Book Award for nonfiction and a N.Y. Emmy award for the documentary series Doing Business in China. He was the founding chairman of the New America Foundation. His two most recent books, Blind Into Baghdad (2006) and Postcards From Tomorrow Square (2009), are based on his writings for The Atlantic. His latest book, China Airborne, was published in early May. He is married to Deborah Fallows, author of the recent book Dreaming in Chinese. They have two married sons.

Fallows welcomes and frequently quotes from reader mail sent via the "Email" button below. Unless you specify otherwise, we consider any incoming mail available for possible quotation -- but not with the sender's real name unless you explicitly state that it may be used. If you are wondering why Fallows does not use a "Comments" field below his posts, please see previous explanations here and here.

Thank you, Martha Raddatz

By James Fallows
Feb 15 2007, 3:30 PM ET

At yesterday's news conference, Martha Raddatz of ABC finally got to ask President Bush directly the question that has been obvious since he first announced his "surge" policy one month ago. Ignore the first sentence of her question and look at what comes after that:

Q Mr. President, do you agree with the National Intelligence Estimate that we are now in a civil war in Iraq? And, also, you talk about victory, that you have to have victory in Iraq; it would be catastrophic if we didn't. You said again today that the enemy would come here, and yet you say it's not an open-ended commitment. How do you square those things?


Of course Bush didn't answer.

He began this way ("You know, victory in Iraq is not going to be like victory in World War II") and never came any closer to dealing with the "how do you square those things?" question she admirably raised. Who knows whether he actually grasped the point she was making. At least she tried.

The press conference marked a turning point for me. For the first time, I actually felt sorry for the President. Every time he returned to his mantra about the Iranian Quds force -- "What we do know is that the Quds force was instrumental in providing these deadly IEDs to networks inside of Iraq" -- and then refused to elaborate or engage further issues, he sounded the way I would if I were forced to appear on live television and deal with hostile questions from a well-informed crowd about something they knew about and I didn't, like opera. I would cling to one sentence -- "What we do know is that La Boheme was one of Puccini's greatest works" -- and refuse to be budged. You could see him seizing opportunities to be "affable," with his painful banter with Mike Allen, ex of the Washington Post, about Allen's new website, and his leaden drollery when asked about the Libby trial and the possibilty of his offering a pardon:

THE PRESIDENT: Not going to talk about it, Peter. (Laughter.) Would you like to think of another question? Being the kind man that I am, I will recycle you. (Laughter.) John.

Q Thank you --

THE PRESIDENT: You like that one? "Recycling" him. (Laughter.)

How much he would prefer just to engage in this kind of bantering. Poor guy. Poor us.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Poll of the Day: Americans' Attitudes About Sin Poll of the Day: Americans' Attitudes About Sin
Meet the 'Fly Boys' of Memphis, the Future of American Education Meet the 'Fly Boys' of Memphis, the Future of Education
Have You Ever Tried to Sell a Used TV? Have You Ever Tried to Sell a Used Flat-Screen TV?
David Cameron, Europe's Latest Scapegoat David Cameron, Europe's Latest Scapegoat
Which of Today's Pop Newcomers Will End Up One-Hit Wonders? Which Pop Newcomers Will Be One-Hit Wonders?

Just In

View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

The American West, 150 Years Ago

May 24, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

James Fallows
from the Magazine

Obama, Explained

As Barack Obama contends for a second term in office, two conflicting narratives of his presidency…

Barack Obama

Facing huge risks and holding inconclusive intel, the president makes a gutsy call to take out bin…

Hacked!

As email, documents, and almost every aspect of our professional and personal lives moves onto the…