Skip Navigation
Ta-Nehisi Coates

Ta-Nehisi Coates

Ta-Nehisi Coates is a senior editor for The Atlantic, where he writes about culture, politics, and social issues for TheAtlantic.com and the magazine. He is the author of the memoir The Beautiful Struggle. More

Born in 1975, the product of two beautiful parents. Raised in West Baltimore—not quite The Wire, but sometimes ill all the same. Studied at the Mecca for some years in the mid-’90s. Emerged with a purpose, if not a degree. Slowly migrated up the East Coast with a baby and my beloved, until I reached the shores of Harlem. Wrote some stuff along the way.

An Expensive Vacation From Hell

Alessandra Stanley's piece on the vacation she took with her daughter is getting battered in the Times comments, but I loved it. I thought the writing was beautiful, and the voice pitch perfect:

On our third day of so-so meals, erratic service and no Jacuzzi or bike repair, I went to a manager and complained, telling him that we felt as if we were at a dress rehearsal for someone else's vacation. 

He was very polite and apologetic, but there was a look in his eye that spooked me -- like that of a hostage who opens the door and pretends everything is O.K. though there is a gun prodding his back. He thanked me for my comments, and though there was no discernible improvement in service, we did later get a thank-you note from the general manager with a tray of chocolate-dipped strawberries. 

So we decided to head over to Miami, restoring our pride and palates over Cuban sandwiches and croquetas at the Versailles restaurant in Little Havana. But all it took was a few minutes in South Beach -- and a peek inside Dash, the Kardashian boutique, where sunburned tourists took pictures of one another -- to make us realize that we didn't have it quite so bad on Fisher Island. 

At least there we weren't surrounded by drunken, half-naked college students racing Segways along Ocean Drive. "I know I sound like I'm 90," Emma whispered, "but I just want them to put some clothes on and go to vocational school." 

 We took the ferry back to the island and felt a surge of affection for its verdant, antiseptic beauty. 

That didn't last. I walked over to the mansion at sunset, pleased to see a line of golf carts parked in front and the sound of laughter and clinking stemware -- le tout Fisher Island had poured out in full resort finery -- for what turned out to be a $125-a-head four-course meal prepared by Daniel Boulud.

That sounded fun and almost like a bargain compared with his New York restaurants, so I raced to the front desk to ask if there was room for two more -- and why had we not been informed about the dinner ahead of time. The woman at the desk looked embarrassed, telling me that it had been mentioned on a flyer given to guests on arrival (I never got one) but that anyway it had sold out long ago.

I think part of the problem is its clear that much of the audience for the piece (it was in the Travel section) weren't looking for literature, but something more practical. A lot of people were upset by the over-entitled and privileged tone, which makes sense if you are looking for "news you can use." But as something more literary, I thought it worked marvelously. 

Trayvon Martin Updates

The notion that George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin didn't get into a fight is basically dead:

A medical report compiled by the family physician of accused Trayvon Martin murderer George Zimmerman and obtained exclusively by ABC News found that Zimmerman was diagnosed with a "closed fracture" of his nose, a pair of black eyes, two lacerations to the back of his head and a minor back injury the day after he fatally shot Martin during an alleged altercation...  

The morning after the shooting, on Feb. 27, Zimmerman sought treatment at the offices of a general physician at a family practice near Sanford, Fla. The doctor notes Zimmerman sought an appointment to get legal clearance to return to work. 

But the report also shows Zimmerman declined hospitalization the night of the shooting, and then declined the advice of his doctor to make a follow-up appointment with an ear nose and throat doctor. In addition to his physical injuries, Zimmerman complained of stress and "occasional nausea when thinking about the violence." 

You can read my thoughts on this here. They remain unchanged.

The Lost Battalion

It's yours on the early side...

Marriage Equality and Humanist Evolution

Jigga speaks:

Applauding the president for endorsing same-sex marriage last week, the rapper said, "I think it's the right thing to do ... whether it costs him votes or not." 

"I've always thought it as something that was still, um, holding the country back," Jay-Z explained. "What people do in their own homes is their business and you can choose to love whoever you love. That's their business. It's no different than discriminating against blacks. It's discrimination plain and simple."
It's always wild seeing rappers come out against homophobia. I've got more than my share of songs I can't really enjoy like I once did. 

But it's good to see, and I can't even say I live outside of it. I can remember coming out of Baltimore and viewing every interaction with someone who was gay with a kind of smug derision. It's the closest I've come to a kind of deep, unstated pride in ignorance -- not so much a violent hostility, but a meanness based almost entirely on not understanding. And frankly not even believing there was anything worth understanding.

When I write with some curiosity about the racist mind, this is really place I'm pulling from. I know how easy it is to believe that people have nothing to contribute, and to hold that belief not out of evidence of their lives, but out of ignorance of them. Still it's one thing for people to tell you why that's wrong -- and that's important. But it's only philosophy. For the facts, I needed real world contact with actual people. I could not simply be told that "diversity is good." I had to see it.

It was a really nice day in New York yesterday. I took my wife and son out for brunch, then roamed a bit with Kenyatta. We ended up in West Village and I was suddenly struck by how thankful I was to gay America. There is probably a more agile way to say that. But the fact is this. You can't really do my job, and live where I have lived, and live how I lived and not deal with the LGBT world. I would go so far as to say that if you are a writer with aspiration, homophobia is bad for business.

But less cynically, if you are a curious person homophobia is bad for business. I was lucky. I got schooled on that as a young man. And, as always -- in the spirit of selfishness -- it was not good for LGBT world that that happened. It was good for me. Smug derision is a kind of stupidity. And people who know better are embarrassed for you, because you are not wise enough to be embarrassed for yourself. The city saved me from that. And I'm happy.

The funny thing is I'm pretty sure even in my other life I would have supported marriage equality. Whatever, my ignorance -- "an offense against God" didn't factor in. And the notion that consenting adults could live as they willed would have disturbed me. But that isn't actual enlightenment. Surely there are racists who voted for Obama.

Marriage Equality Will Not Hurt Obama Among Black Voters At All


The opinions of whites largely reflect the population as a whole: 49% say Obama's expression of support for gay marriage did not alter their opinion of the president. Among those who say it did, somewhat more say it made their view of him less favorable than more (29% vs. 20%). 

Most African Americans, on the other hand, say the announcement did not alter their opinion of Obama. About twothirds (68%) say this, while about as many say it made them view Obama more favorably (16%) as less favorably (13%).

I think Obama ultimately will lose roughly seven or eight votes because of his stand on marriage equality. As I said on Twitter, I think about two of those votes will be black people who claimed to support Obama, but never really did.


4-25-12 #8

There's also the data cited above. As of April, the gap between African-Americans and white support for gay marriage was eight points (39 percent of African-Americans support, while 47 percent of white support.)  The gap between the same groups in terms of opposition was four points (47 percent of blacks oppose and 43 percent of whites opposed.) 

This not strike me as the kind of yawning gulf which could sever Obama from his base. I would go further. Given black America's particular characteristics--more Southern, more culturally conservative, and more religious--focusing on "race" as the defining difference seems like a bad idea. 

It also isn't a very forward-thinking one:

Since 2008, the proportion of African Americans favoring gay marriage has increased from 26% to 39%, while opposition has fallen from 63% to 49%.

Finally it's worth considering what happened the last time someone attempted to turn homophobia into a decisive election issue among a black electorate:

In future races, religious people are going to start going after people's political careers," Jackson, the head of Stand4MarriageDC, told U.S. News and World Report. "You're going to see a bloodletting that is going to mark a new style of engagement for people who are against same-sex marriage." Jackson's was no idle threat. 

Stand4MarriageDC is backed by the National Organization for Marriage. NOM's president, Brian Brown, serves as Stand4MarriageDC's treasurer. In the past two years, NOM has successfully exploited local backlashes against advances in gay rights. In Maine, NOM worked to secure a ballot initiative to outlaw same-sex marriage. 

In New York, it helped torpedo the nomination of moderate, marriage-equality-supporting Republican Dede Scozzafava, which left the contest to two candidates who both opposed same-sex-marriage rights. It aided in the passage of Proposition 8, the California ballot initiative that banned same-sex marriage in the same election that sent Barack Obama to the White House. 

The California victory was initially pinned on the increased turnout of black voters, so on paper, it's easy to see why NOM might have seen Washington, D.C. -- which is more than 50 percent African American -- as the site of another potential victory. Last night's primary election was the time to make good on Jackson's threat. 

But in the nine months since, there's been a lot of cash spent with little blood spilled. According to filings with D.C.'s Office of Campaign Finance, NOM has spent around $140,000 opposing pro-equality candidates in Washington, D.C., all of whom won last night or were defeated by other pro-equality candidates.

If marriage equality opponents can't even throttle a city councilmember, what evidence is there that they would actually be able to touch the first black president? Marshaling support for a homophobic ballot initiative is very different than using homophobia to hurt a presidential candidate. People elect presidents for a variety of reasons. Banning marriage equality, not so much.

At the Movies With 'Big Words'

drumming TNC 615 (1).jpg

As I mentioned last week, I shot a really short scene for the movie Big Words helmed by my friend Neil Drumming. You should check out Neil's ongoing journal here. As for me, I had two reactions. 

First, it convinced that I could never make a movie. Writing is such a lonely, solitary occupation. I've actually never liked this as I'm a pretty social person. But watching Big Words come to life it became clear that this thing had a lot of moving (wonderful) parts. People have to manage jobs, and managers have to manage people. And, more than anything, the writer has to be really willing to allow other people to see something different in their work.

I would go so far as to say that a kind of generosity becomes essential. I had never actually considered that. A lot of people have asked, over the years, why I didn't write The Beautiful Struggle up as a screenplay and push it to the movies. I've thought about a few times. But it's not something I'm really capable of. I say this all the time, but I am, at the end of the day, pretty selfish. I actually do like being alone--even if I don't like the idea of it. I like being in total control. 

Second, I was utterly amazed at how the actors simply will the cameras and crew to disappear and go off to do their job. The day I was visiting, Gbenga Akinnagbe and Zachary Booth were shooting together. When working on fiction (and memoir) I generally do a ton of research and craft a voice. Once I have the voice I try to "forget" all the research and just be the character I'm writing--whether that's a surrealistic take on me circa 1994 (as in The Beautiful Struggle), or a white plantation mistress circa 1854 (as in my present project.) 

But I have the luxury of throwing on a hoodie, and doing that in some dim corner of my favorite cafe. These guys do it with people watching and making suggestions the whole way. I understand they aren't "writing" but they are creating. Zachary and Gbenga's character had to establish a particular bond, a rapport, and they had to do it on the spot. To my knowledge, they had never created anything together before. And yet there they were, making, creating it, in the moment, on the spot.

It was beautiful to see. I can't way for you guys to check this one out.

The picture above is Neil explaining what the hell is going on. The funnest part was trading jokes with Gbenga about Baltimore, and the precise number of bodies left in the vacants.

Prosecutorial Discretion And Child Sexual Abuse

The Times has been doing a really disturbing series on the sexual abuse of children among ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities in Brooklyn. Friday's piece focuses on District Attorney Charles Hynes:
An influential rabbi came last summer to the Brooklyn district attorney, Charles J. Hynes, with a message: his ultra-Orthodox advocacy group was instructing adherent Jews that they could report allegations of child sexual abuse to district attorneys or the police only if a rabbi first determined that the suspicions were credible. The pronouncement was a blunt challenge to Mr. Hynes's authority. 

But the district attorney "expressed no opposition or objection," the rabbi, Chaim Dovid Zwiebel, recalled. In fact, when Mr. Hynes held a Hanukkah party at his office in December, he invited many ultra-Orthodox rabbis affiliated with the advocacy group, Agudath Israel of America. He even chose Rabbi Zwiebel, the group's executive vice president, as keynote speaker at the party....

In 2009, as criticism of his record mounted, Mr. Hynes set up a program to reach out to ultra-Orthodox victims of child sexual abuse. Called Kol Tzedek (Voice of Justice in Hebrew), the program is intended to "ensure safety in the community and to fully support those affected by abuse," his office said. In recent months, Mr. Hynes and his aides have said the program has contributed to an effective crackdown on child sexual abuse among ultra-Orthodox Jews, saying it had led to 95 arrests involving more than 120 victims. 

But Mr. Hynes has taken the highly unusual step of declining to publicize the names of defendants prosecuted under the program -- even those convicted. At the same time, he continues to publicize allegations of child sexual abuse against defendants who are not ultra-Orthodox Jews. 

This policy of shielding defendants' names because of their religious status is not followed by the other four district attorneys in New York City, and has rarely, if ever, been adopted by prosecutors around the country.
Hynes actually argues, bizarrely, that he is protecting the names of offenders--alleged and convicted--to protect the victims.

The whole series is worth checking out. The rate of actual abuse doesn't appear to be higher, but the rate of reporting is significantly lower. The notion that an organization would bar its members from from reporting the abuse of children, without the consent of its authority figures, is rather amazing. That a prosecutor would knowingly consent to it, is strikes me as malpractice and amoral. You are effectively aiding the cover-up, and thus becoming part of the chain of abuse.

The World Is a Ghetto



One of the traps of being African-American and exploring other places is the hope that somewhere beyond the oceans their lies a mystical "Land Without Strangers"--a place where the  racism of America falls away and you can simply be human. 

I know this mostly from reading about the comfort Paul Robeson took in Russia, and various African-Americans took in France. We've talked about this some in the comments and the upshot of course is that there is no such place, or rather if there is the African-American stranger is simply someone else.

I've been thinking about this re-reading Edmund Morgan's American Slavery, American Freedom. Much of Morgan's book is a history of indentured servitude in 17th century Virginia. But more than that the book tells the story of a kind of proto-slavery wherein you see Brits practicing the sort of violence on their own, which they would later perfect on us. 

Men are kidnapped, sold and traded, heinous punishment is doled out, and sexual violence (violence period) against slaves goes unpunished. The early Virginia farmers are constantly scheming for ways to keep their servants reduced to a barely above slavery. It's depressing because you realize that your oppression isn't particularly unique, and your status as oppressed isn't unique. You are simply one Stranger among long line of Strangers.

As you guys know, I've been studying French. It is such a beautiful language and the need to  balance the majesty of France with their human need to create Strangers is a constant thing. I thought about this watching the Hors La Loi. It's streaming on Netflix (as Outside The Law,) and I highly, highly recommend it. It details the independence struggle of Algerians in France and there is so much about it that felt familiar. 

I'm a weird dude. I was telling Kenyatta early today that when we finally go to Paris, as much as I want to see the work of Rodin, I have to see the suburbs. I know, logically, that there really shouldn't be much expectation for commonality in struggle. But I feel it in my bones. I can't even logically explain it. It's like, as someone once said here, being "ethnically Christian." I'm like an "ethnic lefty" or something. 

All kidding aside see Outside The Law. It's beautifully acted. 

The Real Reason Black Voters Will Abandon Obama

Allen West offers some characteristically sober thoughts on Obama and black voters:

Some African Americans will think twice about voting for President Obama in November after he declared his support for gay marriage, according to Republican Rep. Allen West of Florida. 

"I think it's going to cause an incredible discussion in the black community, because, as you know, on Sundays in the black community the most conservative people in America are in those black churches," West told ABC News on Thursday. 

"I think it may have been a huge miscalculation, especially when you have 41 states that recognize marriage between one man and one woman, and you just came off an incredible loss to them. Sixty-nine percent voted for [the recent same-sex marriage ban] in North Carolina, which is a key swing state he barely won last time," West said.

I think Allen West underestimates the problem. 

Giving "special rights" to homosexuals is just the tip of the thing. The leading cause of death among African-Americans is abortion. (The House GOP said it, so it must be true.) Black people are disproportionately anti-death. But the president is not only a fan of death, he's also a fan of death-dealers like Planned Parenthood.

Will Obama's support of black death, cost him black voters? 

On the one hand we have the fact that few, if any, black elected officials have lost their jobs over abortion or gay marriage. On the other we have a trash-bin of discarded theories about black voters, the tight relationship between white social conservatives and the black community,  and the words of a man who pronounces himself a "modern-day Harriet Tubman.

The answer is clear to me. 


I'll Make You Famous

As I've mentioned before my old buddy Neil Drumming is making a movie. Neil is filming tomorrow and Saturday morning and needs extra. Sorry of the late notice. Here are the details:

We will be lining up on Taaffe Place between Myrtle and Willoughby Avenues in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, right near the Pratt University campus. Our costume department humbly requests that all extras try to bring or wear lightweight fall clothing. No heavy jackets. Pants and long sleeves. Preferably no bright colors or logos. 

The call time for extras will be 7:30 a.m. (It's early, yes. But this way, you can participate and still make it in to the office on time.) If you know in advance that you're going to be able to make it, please drop me a line by emailing me or leave confirmation in the comments section below. This is strictly for headcount reasons. You can also just show up. The production will be most grateful either way. 

In addition, we will be staging a mock reading with The Atlantic editor and writer Ta-Nehisi Coates at 8:30 a.m. on Saturday, May 12, at a wonderful bookstore in Soho. If interested, contact us via email and we will provide the location and further details. As my assistant director says often and with gusto: "Let's make a movie, people!"

Come on now. It's your big break.

More on LaVar Arrington's Comments

The former Redskins linebacker tweeted me yesterday asking me, on the basis of his entire interview, to reconsider my post yesterday. I watched the video and would suggest, if you're interested in the subject, you do the same.

A few things:

1.) My assumption was that Arrington had been interviewed in at least partial response to Warner's comments and Seau's death. Actually the interview took place last December. I think that's important because, in comments, I grouped Arrington with Hoge and Toomer. I think Arrington's comments are different. At one point he responds to a friend who won't let his kid play until high school, and does so with respect and intelligence.

2.) From what I can tell (there are cuts in the interview) most of it is about Arrington's relationship with his own kids, and it moments sprawls into a bigger questions about kids coming up in America. But generally, Arrington is talking about his own kids and his own beliefs. 

3.) On the broader issue of football, I still disagree. Arrington's argument is that the great problem is that people aren't playing the game right, But I think a guy like John Mackey played the game right. The scariest thing about Malcolm Gladwell's piece on football was that CTE wasn't merely about concussions or "big hits," but about the regular contact you can expect to see in a clean, well-played football game.

4.) I am thinking of Chris Henry. For years, after he was drafted, Henry was maligned by fans, and generally thought to be a joke. His continued run-ins with the law were utterly mind-boggling. The worst thing, for fans, is a talented player who simply can't discipline himself. When Henry died, he was 26 years old. He was not a lineman, a linebacker or a safety. He had no history of brain injury. But he did have CTE. 

5.) Normally I'd make a joke about LaVar and Troy Aikman here. But that seems inappropriate. You can see video of Arrington effectively ending Aikman's career. I saw that game and, like a good Cowboys fan, hated Arrington. Which is to say I had the upmost respect for Arrington and the ferocity with which he played the game. 

It was a metaphor--as football was--for how I wanted to go through life. Attacking. Embracing contact. Running to the fight, not away from it. I still have those values. But there have to other ways of displaying them without repeated blows to the head.

6.) I still object to the term "sissyfication." And I think this is important. A lot of what LaVar says in that video on manhood, is in my bones. I would go further and say, especially as a black man, given our issues, I especially feel those values. But like a lapsed Christian, I believe it, more than I know it. 

Physical courage will always be important. But more important is understanding that people who are not macho, who are often not even men, regularly exhibit that courage. The fact is that the world has changed. The steel mills have closed. We don't live like our fathers anymore. We need a better vocabulary for men.

7.) I want to thank LaVar for reaching out. My apologies for misconstruing the context.

Black Studies and 'Intellectual Cowardice'

Naomi Schaefer-Riley wrote a piece for the Chronicle of Higher Education calling for the abolition of black studies. This prompted a lengthy back and forth which culminated in Schaefer-Riley being fired. 

My old label-mate Andrew Sullivan responds:

The post prompted a torrent of left-wing outrage and, ultimately, Riley's sacking - which brought out the right's counter-outrage. This time, it seems clear to me that the right is right. Riley's commentary is well within the bounds of provocative opinion writing. Firing her was an act of cowardice and an assault on intellectual freedom.
I had hoped to avoid writing about this because I think Schaefer-Riley was basically the initiator of a High Tech Trolling. But I took to twitter a bit last night, because, like Andrew I was appalled that she'd been fired. I just don't believe that writing something stupid about race should be fire-able.

I do, however, think that proudly defending one's ignorance in a publication dedicated to higher education, should always be fireable. And as was pointed out to me this was exactly what Schaefer-Riley did. In her first essay she wrote:

If ever there were a case for eliminating the discipline, the sidebar explaining some of the dissertations being offered by the best and the brightest of black-studies graduate students has made it. What a collection of left-wing victimization claptrap. The best that can be said of these topics is that they're so irrelevant no one will ever look at them.
In her follow-up Schaefer-Riley then said:

Finally, since this is a blog about academia and not journalism, I'll forgive the commenters for not understanding that it is not my job to read entire dissertations before I write a 500-word piece about them. I read some academic publications (as they relate to other research I do), but there are not enough hours in the day or money in the world to get me to read a dissertation on historical black midwifery. In fact, I'd venture to say that fewer than 20 people in the whole world will read it. And the same holds true for the others that are mentioned in the piece.
Calling for the abolition of a department based on the seeming esoteric nature of its dissertations strikes me as silly. I'm willing to bet I could make the same case against English and Anthropology departments around the country. But calling for the abolition of those departments based on the dissertations, and then bragging that you haven't read any of them is journalistic malpractice. 

Schaefer-Riley isn't merely saying she's ignorant of Black Studies (that would be bad.) She is saying she is ignorant of the very evidence she used to condemn black studies And amazingly she says this as though it were somehow evidence in her favor!

Thus buying Andrew's defense of Schaefer-Riley doesn't simply mean buying the right to criticize black studies. We're all in agreement there. It means buying the right to criticize black studies without doing any substantive research into the field. It means buying the right to speak out of ignorance. 

Put aside Black Studies--Why should anyone like that be covering academics and the work of collegiate scholars? If I wrote that Israel should bomb Iran, but confessed to only reading the headlines in the Times, would you take me seriously? Would you take my publisher seriously?

How is this even an issue? Why would anyone defend the right to be stupid? I'm serious here. This looks really open and shut to me.  

Obama Evolves

If you're going to go down (and I don't think he is) go down with your sword:

OBAMA: I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that Don't Ask Don't Tell is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married.
I know what the polls show, and I know he was pushed into it, but I still credit the president with doing the right thing. So much of this process reminds me of Lincoln weighing emancipation, even as he knew, in his heart, that slavery was a sin.

Moreover, regardless of the push, I think this is really heartening timing after North Carolina, where a ban on gay marriage and civil unions triumphed by some 20 points.

The Lost Battalion

It's yours...

We Should Talk About 'The Avengers'

1.) It was a lot better than I expected. More, I was pretty much wrong in my skepticism of the trailers. I've said this before but a well-paced, thrilling action movie is an actual achievement. Keeping the train on the track is more important, and more difficult, then it actually sounds.

2.) Actors really do matter. I thought Mark Ruffalo and Robert Downey Jr. really were in class by themselves. Downey's Tony Stark has always been great. But I thought Ruffalo wasn't actually "doing" Bruce Banner, he was giving you his own Bruce Banner. I don't know how to explain this except to say that he really inhabited the role. Watching him and Downey play off each other was magic--Downey outsized and Ruffalo gone minimalist, It was a beautiful study in contrast.

3.) Big, big props for not stapling on some dumb unnecessary romance.

4.) And still it wasn't the movie for me. I don't know why. But I think it says something that the character I was most interested in was the Hulk. There was no deeper thing that The Avengers was looking to grapple with. Frankly, I think that's fine. They fully executed their vision, and I have hard time imagining a better Avengers movie. But I'm not there. Bash the bad guys and save the world isn't for me anymore.

4.) And so take this with a grain of salt: I'm still unimpressed by the Spider-Man trailer, and eagerly awaiting the new Batman movie.

LaVar Arrington and the 'Sissyfication' of American Boys

The former Redskins great on youth football:

Arrington, who played linebacker in the NFL for seven seasons and made three Pro Bowls, said during today's Outside the Lines discussion of the hazards of youth football that the risks associated with playing football aren't as bad as the risks associated with teaching your kids that they should be afraid of engaging in physically strenuous activities. 

"To me, it's sissification, and I think that's the only way to put it," Arrington said. "I will not go through my life scared and I don't want my children to go through life scared. I started playing football when I was 8 years old and I would never not want to give that opportunity to my children."

Arrington says he wants his son, LaVar II, to play football, and he believes that when young children are properly supervised and playing the game correctly, they're generally not big and strong enough to seriously injure each other in collisions.

I played two years of youth football. So did my son. We both had a great time and I wouldn't take it back. But I would not do it again. The thing is that's my choice as a parent. Arrington's choice is that he wants his kids to play. Good on him. What rankles is the implication those who thinks differently are raising their boys to be "sissies." (The term is a problem in and of itself.)

More than that it's the implication that the sole means to achieve toughness is running Oklahoma or Bull In A Ring. It needs to be said this particular brand of toughness, while important, is very different from the kind of toughness that all children will need to be functioning adults. Surely it takes a certain mental toughness to play in the NFL. It also takes a certain mental toughness to hold a regular job, to save money, to rear children, to be a good partner, to guard your health. It is no way clear that the kind of toughness football requires, necessarily translates to the kind of toughness the world requires. 

And the world--whether your a pro ball player or not--is always out there waiting.

Method Man With Kids to Raise

As a 80s-90s hip-hop head watching the world go by, this warmed my heart. Method Man talking about marijuana and (more off-handedly) gay rights. Of course if you look at the comments on YouTube the first one is about "faggot ass frat kids." I know. Don't read the comments on YouTube.

It Was All a Dream

All Things Considered ran a segment yesterday on Yoni's transition from commenter to correspondent here at The Atlantic. I can't tell you how proud this makes me. 

I had the luxury of sitting with David Blight last week for coffee. He graciously indulged all my questions for two hours. I tried to explain to him what happens here. The main point I made was that while I set the tone and the agenda, I am not the teacher. 

I learn so much from you guys. (All you need do is look at this for instance.) I pointed out that it was comments on the internet that brought me to David. Very few journalists get this sort of privilege. But this is journalism as I've always known it--not simply presiding as an expert, but learning from the crowd. From the horde.

On that point I'd really like to thank Yoni for his participation. I'd also like to thank Atlantic Media, but specifically, my editors Bob Cohn and James Bennet for letting me roam. When I got here we had a skeleton web cast. I said: "What am I supposed to talk about?" They said: "Anything." We've been in love ever since.

Forgive the earnestness guys. You know my story. Being at The Atlantic is one thing. But watching Yoni attract this sort of note is another world. This is--by far--the most dynamic job I've ever had in my life. Every day there's something new. I have no idea where this ends.

What Football Means, Cont.


Brandon Marshall, who's had his own mental health troubles, pivots off of Junior Seau's death to offer some candid words on the price of male toughness:

The cycle starts when we are young boys and girls. Let me illustrate it for you: Li'l Johnny is outside playing and falls. His dad tells him to get up and be strong, to stop crying because men don't cry. So even from the age of 2, our belief system begins to form this picture. We are teaching our boys not to show weakness or share any feelings or emotions, other than to be strong and tough. Is that ''validating''? 

What do we do when Li'l Susie falls? We say: ''It's OK. I'm here. Let me pick you up.'' That's very validating, and it's teaching our girls that expressing emotions is OK. We wonder why it's so hard to bridge the communication gap between men and women. 

This presented itself clearly when I was going through group therapy and was the only man in my groups. Better yet, I was there for three months, and there was only one other guy in the program. In therapy, I learned how to express my emotions and talk about my problems, then apply it to my real life. I had to work through my entire belief system, train myself how to think, not what to think, and let go of the things that had me in bondage. I had to bridge the gap. It wasn't going to do it on its own. It's a cycle. 

Can you imagine how this presents itself even more so in football players? Junior Seau, Kenny McKinley, Dave Duerson, Brandon Marshall, etc. I am the only one in that group who is living because I got help before it was too late. In sports, those who show they are hurt or have mental weakness or pain are told: ''You're not tough. You're not a man. That's not how the players before you did it.''

Great points in here. I think the hard thing is that some of us very much value "toughness." I certainly do and have tried to instill it in my son, if not by the methods Marshall describes. I loved the NFL because it exemplified that value. Probably my favorite play ever--which I have posted here ad nauseum--comes from the 1998 playoffs. A young Terrell Owens was having a horrible game--I think he'd drop two or three passes. But he caught the game-winner from Steve Young in the end zone taking a big and holding on to the ball.

He cried like a baby walking off the field. And I saw "toughness" in him holding on to the ball. I've thought about that play at least once a week for the rest of my life. (Vernon Davis damn near mirrored the same scene last season. Something in the water.) It exemplifies something about my own values, about my own life. I have seen so much failure and yet also have seen how, by the rigorous application of a principal, a sweet success, dwarfing all your failures, can be yours.

I see that play and I just get chills--even now. But I'm a humanist too. As evidenced on this blog, I believe in sharing emotion. I detest bullying those who are seen as "weak." I think a lot about how to transfer those twin values to my son. Empathy and toughness. Rigor and flexibility. They aren't necessarily opposed. But it takes some doing to transmit both at the same time.

The Lost Battalion

It's yours...
Special Report
Capitals of the Connected World The Atlantic Capitals of the Connected World
Mapping the new global power structure—an Atlantic special report Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Views From the Night Sky: London and the U.K.

May 16, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Ta-Nehisi Coates
from the Magazine

Why Do So Few Blacks Study the Civil War?

Ta-Nehisi Coates is an Atlantic senior editor.

Fade to White

A filmmaker maps Austin’s shifting ethnic landscape.

The Legacy of Malcolm X

Why his vision lives on in Barack Obama