Editors' Note

James Bennet
The Great Recession has upended millions of lives and laid bare structural weaknesses--commercial, social, governmental--in the United States and around the world. Economists are still attempting to sort out its causes and consequences; policy makers are struggling to lay a foundation for long-term growth while shoring up a fragile recovery; people across America are trying to get by and, if they can afford the luxury of thinking ahead, to gird themselves for an uncertain new era.

In the hope of helping our readers better understand these times, we are combining the editorial strengths of National Journal and The Atlantic to create a series of supplements devoted to the "next economy." With financial support from Allstate, we plan to publish these supplements quarterly; they will accompany selected subscriber issues of National Journal and The Atlantic and will also be posted on our websites.

For this inaugural issue of The Next Economy, we chose to focus on the generation that will be shaped most profoundly by the changes under way, the so-called Millennials, those Americans born between 1981 and 2002. As Ronald Brownstein writes in our cover story, this is the most diverse and educated generation in U.S. history, and among the most optimistic. But its members' high expectations are colliding with the reality of an unemployment rate that has doubled for young workers over the last three years. And as Don Peck explains in an accompanying essay, generations that enter a difficult job market often find their careers constrained for years to come.

As we will in future supplements, we attempt here to provide some guidance to readers and policy makers alike, while also trying to remain humble about judgments best left to history. If the past can be said to tap out any certain rhythm, as James Fallows writes in his back-page column, it is that more change is afoot than we can begin to imagine--most of it for the better.

James Bennet
The Atlantic

Charles Green
National Journal

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Related Content

  • Global Warming: Who Loses—and Who Wins?

    Climate change in the next century (and beyond) could be enormously disruptive, spreading disease and sparking wars. It could also be a windfall for some people, businesses, and nations. A guide to how we all might get along in a warming world. Apr 2007

  • Gut Reactions

    The termite’s stomach, of all things, has become the focus of large-scale scientific investigations. Could the same properties that make the termite such a costly pest help us solve global warming? Sep 2008

  • The California Experiment

    Busted budgets, failing schools, overcrowded prisons, gridlocked government—California no longer beckons as America’s promised land. Except, that is, in one area: creating a new energy economy. But is its path one the rest of the nation can follow? Oct 2009

  • Breaking the Global-Warming Gridlock

    Both sides on the issue of greenhouse gases frame their arguments in terms of science, but each new scientific finding only raises new questions -- dooming the debate to be a pointless spiral. It's time, the authors argue, for a radically new approach: if we took practical steps to reduce our vulnerability to today's weather, we would go a long way toward solving the problem of tomorrow's climate. Jul 2000

  • Global Warming: The Convenient Truth

    Slow-but-steady is not only the easiest approach to dealing with global warming; it is also the most effective. Mar 2007

Subscribe Now

SAVE 65%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY


Sign up to receive our free newsletters