Skip Navigation

Provocation of the Day: President Obama is Worse on Civil Liberties Than His Predecessor

Jun 8 2010, 6:47 AM ET Conor Friedersdorf

A brief explanation since this post is the beginning of a new feature: Each day I intend to post a provocative argument as a prompt, hoping that Atlantic readers, for whom I'm always thrilled to write, jump into the fray. That I post an argument shouldn't be taken as evidence that I agree with it, only that it's well-suited to inspiring a productive, interesting debate. That being the goal, I implore commenters to be polite, and to avoid turning these conversations into attempts at scoring political or ideological points.

Okay, onward to today's prompt:

The Obama Administration is proving to be even more ruinous to civil liberties than its White House predecessor. So far, President Obama has refused to hold former officials accountable for laws broken during the Bush era, strengthening the expectation that violations committed in the name of national security will go unpunished even when the guilty officials no longer hold power. On numerous issues, he has adopted and therefore normalized Bush-era claims about detention issues and executive power, sometimes using even more troubling legal arguments. Perhaps most problematically, the Obama Administration -- like its predecessor -- claims the unchecked power to assassinate American citizens abroad, and unlike its predecessor is aggressively pursuing that tactic.

After running on a platform that included rolling back civil liberties violations, and winning the White House handily, President Obama was uniquely positioned to halt and reverse War on Terrorism excesses. Instead he has lent implicit credibility to the policies of his predecessor, behaved worse on some discrete issues, and all but guaranteed that neither presidential candidate in 2012 will commit to a needed course correction. Should the degraded status of civil liberties that President Bush initiated become the new status quo in America, rather than a temporary overreaction to a terrorist attack, President Barack Obama and the Democrats giving him a pass on civil liberties will bear a significant portion of the blame, along with  President Bush and many hawkish conservatives.

Use the comments section to reply, or if you prefer, longer responses can be sent by e-mail to conor.friedersdorf@gmail.com -- I'll post the best ones if the conversation merits a followup.


Presented by

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Just In

Idea of the Day Show Us What We Spend on Power

Show Us What We Spend on Power

Electricity bills are confusing, and don't arrive until long after the damage is done. The fix to a system that's high in both costs and headaches lies in connecting consumers to their consumption--show people what they're using in real time, and make it easy to compare costs to kilowatts. Geoffrey Gagnon

Features from the Magazine: Stories from our
The End of Men

The End of Men

The sexes: Women are dominating society as never before. By Hanna Rosin Plus: Are Fathers Necessary? By Pamela Paul

Xanadu

Xanadu

Energy: A map of one couple's attempt to build the world's greenest home By Joshua Green

Closing the Digital Frontier

Closing the Digital Frontier

Technology: How media companies are taming the Internet's chaos By Michael Hirschorn

The Littlest Schoolhouse

The Littlest Schoolhouse

Education: Helping wayward students—by personalizing curricula By Ta-Nehisi Coates

No Refills

No Refills

Business: Why are fewer drugs being approved, even as R&D surges? By Megan McArdle

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Ending Poverty

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Ending Poverty

Wealth of nations: An eminent economist discovers the virtues of colonialism. By Sebastian Mallaby

The Case for Calling Them Nitwits

The Case for Calling Them Nitwits

Security: Most terrorists are bungling fools. Spread the word. By Daniel Byman and Christine Fair