Or of clips remarking on the moment when the partisan audience booed a question from a soldier in Iraq ... because the soldier was gay. See below; the first 22 seconds are the heart of it. But if you watch another ten seconds you'll hear a truly droll assertion from Rick Santorum.
You have to wonder: is there such a thing as a party going too far? This is one of "our troops," whom politicians of all camps promise to "support." He is on duty in Iraq. And a crowd is booing him ... because he is gay? This is like booing black troops, because they were black, after Harry Truman ordered that the the military be desegregated in 1948. People who would have done that in those days were out-and-out bigots -- people who let color prejudice turn them against fellow Americans who were sacrificing on their behalf. And their successors who booed tonight?
So, yes, that's the ugliness that will last from this "Fox/Google" debate. (This whole event was not Google's finest moment.) But here's the line that truly deserves pondering upon: It came when each of the candidates was asked to suggest the ideal vice presidential candidate if he or she were the nominee. And Rick Perry -- who also said that he would "always err on the side of life," an interesting counterpoint to the cheers he got earlier for having overseen more executions than any other governor -- answered thus:
"I would like to take Herman Cain and mate him up with Newt Gingrich."
Reflect on that for a while. In all its ramifications.
And, good night.
(By the way: No one is in love with Mitt Romney, but he is moving smoothly toward being the nominee. And Rick Perry gave another reminder why he is a version of Michele Bachmann -- more executive experience, yes, but equally unready for big-time scrutiny. If anybody wants to bet on a President Rick Perry being sworn in on January 20, 2013, I'll take the action on the other side.)
This article available online at: