I think Bill Clinton
makes some fair points in his intemperate rant against Todd Purdum. But in a lot of ways, the flaws in Purdum's article (lots of innuendos about illicit sex) serve to obscure the valid points (we know very little about the financing of Clinton's lifestyle and his foundation) and the notion that the publication of a a single article on this subject far too late to impact the process represents a vast pro-Obama conspiracy in the press is laughable.
It's
GQ after all, that
killed a critical story about Hillary Clinton because Bill threatened to freeze them out unless they did it. In general, coverage of Bill's post-presidency has been exceedingly respectful,
even in the generally Obamaphilic
Atlantic.
This article available online at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2008/06/bill-strikes-back/45199/