Timesd OnlineRISK-FREE Trial Issue!
u_topn picture
rub_ed picture

Who Should Lead America into the Next Century?

October 22 - November 5, 1996

Created by Jack Beatty, senior editor of The Atlantic,
Al From, president of the Democratic Leadership Council,
and Kate O'Beirne, Washington editor of The National Review.


View the results of this poll.
See the responses to this scenario.
Read how Executive Decision works.


Presidential Seal

EXECUTIVE-DECISION MEMORANDUM



To: The Electorate
From: Jack Beatty
Re: The Election
Date: October 22, 1996




Dear Voter:

Campaign '96 is a doozy. Bill Clinton, whose former business partners and former deputy Attorney General are in jail, whose wife may be facing indictment for obstruction of justice, who himself is facing a sexual-harassment charge, and who is being investigated by a Special Prosecutor on several other charges, is running against a seventy-three-year-old former Senator who has simultaneously proposed a balanced-budget amendment and a fifteen percent tax cut, has argued that cigarettes are not addictive, has placed the Dodgers in Brooklyn, and has sometimes forgotten what city he is in. The campaign has been devoid of eloquence, passion, serious debate, even serious questioning. Among the issues not debated: the emergence of an "apartheid economy," in which the top twenty percent of the population prospers while the bottom eighty percent faces declining real wages and falling living standards; the looming crisis of entitlements -- Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, and federal pensions -- a problem that both candidates have left up to a "commission" to discuss; and the negative effects of the global economy on many Americans. What about the enlargement of NATO? No debate. The size of the defense budget in the post-Cold War world? No debate. Strategic defense against missile attacks from rogue states or terrorist groups? Nothing. Should legal immigration be cut back significantly? No debate. How can we end poverty? Nil. How to protect the more than 40 million Americans without medical insurance? Nope. Affirmative action? You guessed it.

The issues that Clinton and Dole have debated have mostly centered around the economics of rival tax-cut plans, and neither candidate has dared to argue against tax cuts of any kind. The one real difference between them -- Clinton favors unrestricted abortion rights and Dole (or at least the platform he's running on) favors ending the right to abortion in almost all cases -- has rarely been mentioned in the campaign. Yet somehow the impression remains that this campaign has been about "the issues."

Campaign '96 completes a pattern long in development: presidential elections, we can now say, are all but exclusively decided on the business cycle. President Clinton poses beside a recovery for which his policies are only remotely responsible, and that is enough to ensure his reelection. Foreign policy, with the Cold War over, barely figures in elections. Burning social issues matter only to a committed minority of voters in each party's base. Public ethics? In the absence of proof of wrong-doing (the Nixon tapes, for example) a President's conduct in office just does not seem to matter. The swing vote that decides elections is now a referendum on the business cycle. Recovery spells reelection; recession, defeat. This is the significance of this campaign. It marks the end of issues: the gods of the business cycle now rule. How ironic that, just when Marxism has collapsed as a creed, American politics should vindicate its core idea of economic determinism.

This analysis of Campaign '96 may make you feel like not voting at all. But Al From, president of the Democratic Leadership Council, will try to persuade you of Clinton's merits, and Kate O'Beirne, Washington editor of The National Review, will try to persuade you of Dole's. If you think another candidate would do a better job, write him/her in. The decision here -- and on November 5 -- is yours.

Here are your options:

A: Let Clinton Finish the Job He Started, by Al From

B: Bob Dole: A Better Man for a Better America, by Kate O'Beirne

C: Other (Please write your own argument in favor of him or her in the space provided below.)


Option A
Let Clinton Finish the Job He Started


President Clinton deserves to be reelected. He promised to change the country and that is exactly what he has done. Four years ago the economy was slumping, crime was up, and the federal deficit was at an all-time high. Our government was paralyzed, caught in a brain-dead debate between "every man for himself" Republicans and "government can solve every problem" Democrats.

President Clinton realized that the American people needed to forge a new compact with their government -- a compact whereby government promoted opportunity to, and demanded responsibility from, all Americans in order to create a better community. Opportunity, responsibility, and community -- that's the message on which Bill Clinton was elected and the philosophy by which he has governed.

Take opportunity. The Democratic Party's oldest and most fundamental principle can be found in the old rallying cry of Andrew Jackson: "Equal opportunity for all and special privilege for none." This is the ideal of a society in which government empowers people by giving them the basic tools they need to unlock their talents and ambitions, one that allows people to succeed within a system of fair and open rules. To encourage opportunity, President Clinton expanded the Earned-Income Tax Credit so that every full-time worker is guaranteed an income above the poverty level. He also has proposed a new G.I. Bill for American Workers, modeled on the successful bill that educated a generation of Americans after the Second World War, that would give people vouchers so that they, and not the federal government, can decide where to get the skills they need.

Take responsibility. If government is going to provide opportunity for all, then it is fair to ask for something in return. The President's new compact with the American people can succeed only if we the people are prepared to fulfill our civic duties and contribute our fair share to the commonwealth. In this spirit, President Clinton established AmeriCorps, a national service program founded on the principle that citizens who receive government support for education or training ought to give service time back to their country. In order to end a welfare system that gave something for nothing, the President pushed for work-based welfare reform. In addition since government has a responsibility to work at maximum efficiency, President Clinton and Vice President Gore have reduced the federal work force by 225,000 workers and have dumped 16,000 pages of burdensome and often outdated regulation.

Take Community. To help fight crime in our communities, President Clinton has pushed for legislation that will put an additional 100,000 cops on the streets. He fought for passage of the Brady Bill to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, and he led the fight to ban assault-style weapons. He supported the television "V" chip to give parents control over what comes into their homes, and he advocated penalties for parents whose kids are chronically truant.

Four years ago President Clinton offered the American people a new vision for the future. That vision is starting to become reality. The federal deficit has been cut by sixty percent, and we have the lowest combined rates of unemployment, inflation, and home mortgages in twenty-eight years. Ten million new jobs have been created, the number of people on welfare is down, wages are up, and for four years in a row the crime rate has gone down. The country is undeniably better off than it was four years ago, although obviously there is still work that remains to be done. Bill Clinton has earned the chance to do that work and to finish the job he started.

-- Al From, president of the Democratic Leadership Council


Option B
Bob Dole: A Better Man for a Better America


"A Better Man For a Better America" might be the political equivalent of "Just Do It," but it also happens to be true of Bob Dole and his agenda.

On the morning after the election I want my young sons to recognize that Americans have elected a man of character. Bob Dole has exhibited a capacity for self-sacrifice, courage, and commitment to principle. His public career is marked by trustworthiness and a set of core beliefs that Bill Clinton simply does not share. Character counts.

The centerpiece of the Dole agenda is his economic plan, but improved race relations and progress in the abortion controversy are also reasons to support Dole.

The average American family pays 38.2 percent of its income in taxes, thus spending more on the government's needs than on their own food, clothing, and housing combined. Parents aren't working longer hours to boost their family's well-being but rather to meet the unprecedented demands of government. Dole's tax cut plan would mean a tax savings of $1,261 for a family of four making $30,000 a year -- an 86 percent reduction in taxes owed. A family of four with an income of $75,000 would see their taxes reduced by 21 percent -- $300 a month more to spend as they see fit. Clinton's targeted temporary tax cuts offer 10 cents in tax relief for every one dollar of the Dole reduction.

The Dole economic plan would provide much-needed tax relief while balancing the budget. This is not the impossible feat Clinton claims it is; it would not even (unfortunately) eliminate government as we know it. Federal spending under the Dole plan would increase by $250 billion over the next six years -- that's 2.1 percent a year, instead of the 2.95 percent it would increase a year under Clinton's plan. The Dole budget would be a down payment on the commitment to help parents who want to work less and spend more time with their children.

Unless dramatically reformed, federal entitlements are unsustainable. Bob Dole has a serious plan to curb the growth of Medicare that his opponent has shamelessly disparaged. The lesson of the 1996 race should not be that politicians dare not face up to the crisis in entitlement spending. Bob Dole's political courage ought to be rewarded by adult voters who don't shrink from hard truths.

Bob Dole supports the elimination of state-based discrimination through the use of race and gender preferences for employment and college admissions. Affirmative action to provide equal opportunity is defensible, but a racial spoils system under which Americans, based on their ancestry, are set against one another is not. Dole would eliminate the federal spoils system, a move that would improve America's racial climate by not magnifying grievances that encourage race-consciousness.

Polls and recent congressional votes prove that pro-life and pro-choice Americans have found long-sought common ground. They agree that the gruesome practice of partial-birth abortions should be banned. While Clinton has already vetoed a bill that would have banned these abortions, Bob Dole has pledged to prohibit them, leaving a door open for compromise.

As a "soccer mom," I'll vote for Bob Dole in behalf of the sons I shuttle to endless practices. They deserve an America that rewards good character, limits the burdens of government, rewards its citizens for their accomplishments rather than their ancestry, and listens to the moral choices its citizens have made.

-- Kate O'Beirne, Washington editor of The National Review.


Click
here to return to the index of Executive Decisions.
All material © 1996 by The Atlantic Monthly Company.
Cover Atlantic Unbound The Atlantic Monthly Post & Riposte Atlantic Store Search

Subscribe to The Atlantic Monthly!
Click here to give The Atlantic.