Executive Decision Results
for 7/1-7/15
Review
During the past two weeks our hypothetical Chief Executives (you) had to make a
decision concerning U.S. policy on balancing the budget. The options presented to the President
by his or her aides
were the following:
Option A: Learn From Reagan's Mistakes -- balancing the budget
should be a top priority, especially as the Baby Boomer generation draws
closer to retirement age.
Option B: Learn From Hoover's Mistakes -- concentrating on a
balanced budget could actually hurt our economy; it's often not really
necessary.
The Results
Option A: 51%
Option B: 49%
Many who supported Option A felt that the first step in balancing the
budget should be cutting down the "federal bureaucracy." Others said that the bigger
the deficit, the higher
the tax rates and pointed out that paying the interest on the national
debt won't be so manageable once interest rates go up. On a less specific
level several respondents felt that having a deficit damages our
country's image and confidence.
Supporters of Option B said that investing in our country's infrastructure
to encourage growth
is more important than achieving a balanced budget. Many suggested cuts
in entitlements, the military, and corporate welfare as ways to keep our
budget under control. Some mentioned analyses showing that every time the
government has balanced the budget a depression has followed. Some,
however, said
that the present candidates would never choose this option because it is
not politically feasible.
Party Lines
| Option |
Democrats |
Republicans |
Independents |
Other |
Unregistered |
| Option A |
10% |
24% |
9% |
4% |
2% |
| Option B |
26% |
3% |
11% |
2% |
5% |
The Significance of the Issue. Respondents clearly felt that this
is an issue on which the government must take a stand. More people said
that balancing the budget was "the most significant issue" than in any other poll we've
conducted.
| Issue |
Most Significant |
Very Important |
Fairly Important |
Not Very Important |
Completely Irrelevant |
| Balancing the Budget |
17% |
49% |
21% |
9% |
3% |
| Tobacco Regulation |
0% |
10% |
28% |
43% |
15% |
| Trade Policy |
6% |
35% |
45% |
13% |
0% |
| Campaign-Finance Reform |
9% |
41% |
27% |
20% |
4% |
| Health-Care Reform |
4% |
39% |
41% |
13% |
2% |
| Entitlement Reform |
12% |
56% |
27% |
4% |
2% |
| Immigration Reform |
2% |
32% |
50% |
15% |
1% |
Age. Those over 55 were largely in favor of not balancing the
budget, perhaps because some in that age group were born during
the Depression, when a balanced budget was neglected in order to create
government programs to aid those affected by the downturn in the economy.
| Age Range |
Option A |
Option B |
| Under 18 |
1% |
1% |
| 18-34 |
20% |
15% |
| 35-44 |
15% |
11% |
| 45-54 |
11% |
9% |
| Over 55 |
3% |
11% |
Race and Gender. There were too few non-white respondents to
present a good statistical analysis of whether responses differed among the
races. Women made up 17% of respondents to this scenario. They differed
little from men in terms of how likely they were to select Option A or B,
but they did have a different take on how significant the balanced-budget
issue is.
| Significance |
Most Significant |
Very Important |
Fairly Important |
Not Very Important |
Completely Irrelevant |
| Female |
1% |
9% |
6% |
2% |
1% |
| Male |
17% |
40% |
15% |
6% |
0% |
Click here to return to the Executive Decision
index page.
Copyright ©1996 by The Atlantic Monthly Company. All rights
reserved.
|