Congress Needs an Outside Expert to Understand the NSA

The newest evidence that the NSA isn't being forthcoming with the lawmakers charged with overseeing it
Reuters

Throughout the NSA leak scandal, the surveillance agency's defenders have insisted its actions are legitimate in part because they're overseen by all three branches of government. The characterization has always been extremely misleading. For example, the secret FISA-court system is often incapable of verifying the truth of what they're told by the NSA, and so many members of Congress were ignorant of how the Patriot Act has been interpreted prior to the last reauthorization; had the ignorant voted the other way, the law wouldn't have been reauthorized as is.

This week we got even further confirmation that the NSA isn't forthcoming enough with Congress to permit legislators to properly do their jobs. The new evidence comes from security technologist Bruce Schneier

This morning I spent an hour in a closed room with six Members of Congress: Rep. Logfren, Rep. Sensenbrenner, Rep. Scott, Rep. Goodlate, Rep. Thompson, and Rep. Amash. No staffers, no public: just them. Lofgren asked me to brief her and a few Representatives on the NSA. She said that the NSA wasn't forthcoming about their activities, and they wanted me -- as someone with access to the Snowden documents -- to explain to them what the NSA was doing.

Calling the meeting "candid and interesting," he made the point that bears emphasis: "It's extremely freaky that Congress has such a difficult time getting information out of the NSA that they have to ask me. I really want oversight to work better."

Remember this the next time an NSA defender claims that Congress is fully briefed on the activities of the surveillance state: Actual members of Congress are so frustrated with the NSA's lack of helpfulness and candor that they're relying on outside help—and the outside help acquired much of his knowledge from the Snowden leaks. 

Presented by

Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction.

Why Is Google Making Human Skin?

Hidden away on Google’s campus, doctors at a world-class life sciences lab are trying to change the way people think about their health.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Videos

Why Is Google Making Human Skin?

Hidden away on Google’s campus, doctors are changing the way people think about health.

Video

How to Build a Tornado

A Canadian inventor believes his tornado machine could solve the world's energy crisis.

Video

A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This short film takes you on a whirling tour of the Big Apple

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

Video

The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in Politics

Just In