4 Specific Ways the NSA's Phone Dragnet Is Illegal

A special bonus: Click now to see how it also violates the law in a fifth way.
Reuters

The federal agency that declared the NSA's telephone dragnet illegal has now released its 238-page report. One of its best features is a succinct presentation of four specific reasons that the program cannot be justified even under the Patriot Act. "There are four grounds upon which we find that the telephone records program fails to comply with Section 215," the text states. Here are those reasons: 

  1. "The telephone records acquired under the program have no connection to any specific FBI investigation at the time of their collection."
  2. "Because the records are collected in bulk—potentially encompassing all telephone calling records across the nation—they cannot be regarded as 'relevant' to any FBI investigation as required by the statute without redefining the word relevant in a manner that is circular, unlimited in scope, and out of step with the case law from analogous legal contexts involving the production of records."
  3. "The program operates by putting telephone companies under an obligation to furnish new calling records on a daily basis as they are generated (instead of turning over records already in their possession)—an approach lacking foundation in the statute and one that is inconsistent with FISA as a whole."
  4. "The statute permits only the FBI to obtain items for use in its investigations; it does not authorize the NSA to collect anything." 

There is, as well, a fifth way that the program is illegal:

In addition, we conclude that the program violates the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. That statute prohibits telephone companies from sharing customer records with the government except in response to specific enumerated circumstances, which do not include Section 215 orders. 

And that's leaving aside all arguments about how the dragnet violates the United States Constitution. The conclusion that it's illegal isn't, it seems to me, a close call. 

Presented by

Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction.

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well. Bestselling author Mark Bittman teaches James Hamblin the recipe that everyone is Googling.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.

Video

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Video

The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.

Video

Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.

Video

Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Politics

Just In