What Every Presidential Daily Briefing Should Include

Perspective
More
obama full full reuters full.jpg
Reuters

Here's an excellent thought from James Traub: "Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan used to argue that with the rise of the 'national security state' in the years after World War II, every president began his day with a terrifying intelligence briefing which left no doubt that his great responsibility was to protect the American people from danger, not to promote their welfare. That, too, is a balance -- a balance gone terribly awry. Perhaps Obama should occasionally let the Department of Education deliver the President's Daily Briefing. He needs to remind himself -- and us -- of why he is there."

Here's a related idea. If I could insert a footer at the bottom of a Presidential Daily Briefing, it might say something like this:

  • The odds are heavily against there being a terrorist attack today.
  • Almost 200 Americans will almost certainly die from preventable infections contracted at hospitals today.
  • Suicides are likely to take the lives of more active duty soldiers this week than terrorists. 
  • The average American is orders of magnitude more likely to die today in a car accident or by a gunshot than in a terrorist attack. 
  • America's most serious overreaction to the September 11 terrorist attacks -- the war in Iraq -- killed far more Americans than 9/11 itself, as well as killing orders of magnitude more innocent people.
  • Russian nukes, rogue asteroids, and greater than expected climate change -- all of these pose existential threats to the U.S. in a way that terrorism doesn't at present. 
  • The Pacific Rim is more important to America's national security than the Middle East.
  • No counterterrorism policy can stop all terrorist attacks.

Maybe the briefing President Obama receives already includes all of this perspective, but you wouldn't know it from his behavior. A different set of bullet points could as easily make the same point, but I'd include one statement every day: "You took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, not to keep us safe." Of course, protecting and defending the Constitution ultimately keeps us much safer than habitually disregarding it, but presidents -- who conceive of the nation in four year terms, and then through the lens of their own legacy -- seldom see it that way.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity

Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In