Angry Young Men (and Women): The Boston Bombing and a Lost Generation

Any attempt to understand the Tsarnaevs's terrorism will fail unless it considers the simmering despair of America's twentysomethings.
Bob Leonard/Associated Press

The one universal reaction to the terror attacks in Boston has been shock. We cannot believe that a family that traveled thousands of miles on order to live in this country would so dramatically turn its disaffection on the state. We cannot believe that a young man who seemed so well adjusted could have planted bombs with his disgruntled older brother. And "the fact that young people could have done this may be the greatest madness of all," a New Yorker correspondent wrote.

But to one young person, at least, the perpetrators' youth feels predictable. From Newtown to Aurora to Tel Aviv to Karachi, young people commit many of the world's violent acts. In our efforts to untangle the knot of causes that, pulled taut, led to the Boston bombing, youth and its discontents have been overlooked -- maybe because they are generally overlooked.

The bombers were young -- and, today, that is a perilous thing to be. The unemployment rate for Americans ages 16 to 24, at 16.2 percent, is twice the national average. Young people who are underemployed, or who have gone back to school for another expensive degree to avoid unemployment, are not included in that figure. Some of us, crumbing under the weight of our student debt, have committed suicide. We report high levels of depression and anxiety; commentators have not failed to note that we seem to have trouble coping with adversity.

The media also report that, for instance, job seekers who have been out of work for more than six months are essentially unemployable. That idea is terrifying for a person of any age. But put it together with the employment statistic, and look at it from the perspective of a young person. We are being told that our lives could be over before they even begin.

It's a wonder that the same writers who have commented so perceptively on the Boston attack don't see the danger in that.

Pieces like Time's silly new cover story -- whose rollicking lede calls millennials "lazy, entitled, selfish and shallow" -- compound our problems by making us the problem, downplaying the role social forces like unemployment have played in our development. There is a particular irony to the timing of the story: It was posted online within hours of the International Labor Organization's new report on the global youth-unemployment crisis, which The Atlantic's Derek Thompson writes about here.

Yes, the Time story ends with an issue-selling, counterintuitive twist: Millennials are spoiled, but their personality traits suit them well to survival in a networked age. The second movement is cheap, and not as persuasively argued as the initial thesis. Articles like this provide older Americans with psychological justification for ignoring their guilt over the concrete problems young people face. If millennials are dreadful, even a little sociopathic, then why should anyone focus on improving their life prospects? This attitude, comforting and stimulating though it may be for older people, poisons the debate over youth issues. It is time for a reset.


Millennials have had it easy in many ways, as the press never fails to note. But we also had a rough start: Our childhoods were punctuated by the September 11th terrorist attacks. Some young people use prescription drugs or marijuana as palliatives. But palliatives don't stop many of us from feeling that a society in trouble has decided to throw away its newest members first.

No doubt the frequent negative portrayals of millennials in the broader culture make this situation easier for our elders to stomach. The problems we face as a group are made into a spectacle by a press that calls us a tragic "lost generation" with one breath and "lazy," flighty, and "coddled" with the next. These problems are trivialized by glib portrayals in popular culture. (Lena Dunham is a gifted writer, but Girls does us no favors politically.) And as things go in the broader culture, so they go in the home. Loving parents who fret about their own children don't seem to realize that a generation, to some extent, rises and falls together. If the job market contracts, it squeezes all young people into lower-paying, lower-prestige jobs. If pessimism about the future breeds anxiety and depression in some of us, a bad attitude is likely to infect the rest of us. Clinching a full-time job doesn't feel like much of a victory if your best friend is still sleeping on his mother's couch.

Presented by

Emily Chertoff is a former writer and producer for The Atlantic's National channel.

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well. Bestselling author Mark Bittman teaches James Hamblin the recipe that everyone is Googling.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus


How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.


Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.


The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.


Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.


Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses


Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Politics

Just In