Romney Momentum Update: Still Zilch (at Best)

More

Yesterday I noted that, with two days of post-debate tracking poll results now in, it was starting to look as if that final presidential debate had killed the momentum Mitt Romney seemed to have going into it. Now, with three days of tracking poll results in, things look, if anything, a bit worse for Romney than they looked yesterday.

Yesterday the key number was 0.6. Eight tracking polls that had reported results for Wednesday -- two days after the debate -- showed an average movement of 0.6 points in Obama's direction compared to the final pre-debate polling numbers they had reported.

Today's numbers, which include polling done three days after the debate, showed an average movement of 1.0 points toward Obama relative to the final pre-debate polls.

Two asterisks, one that works in Romney's favor and one that works in Obama's favor:

First, on Romney's behalf, it should be said that the poll that shows the strongest net gain for Obama -- the RAND poll -- has the most eccentric methodology. It interviews the exact same people every day, week after week. Presumably the knowledge that they'll be interviewed each day makes them behave atypically--by, say, focusing more than the average voter on news about the candidates. If we got rid of this poll (which I originally included because it was one of the eight polls summarized by Nate Silver of The New York Times), Obama's net gain would drop from 1.0 to 0.6.

However, there's also a point that works in Obama's favor. In general, as I noted yesterday, tracking polls are somewhat opaque, because they don't release the results for individual days, but rather just the latest rolling multi-day average. So none of the numbers I reported yesterday reflected only post-debate polls. However, because two of the polls (PPP and Rasmussen) are three-day tracking polls, today, for the first time, we have numbers that reflect only post-debate polls--polls conducted on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, following the Monday night debate. And these two polls show an average post-debate gain for Obama of 1.5 points -- 2 points in the PPP poll and 1 point in the Rasmussen poll. So the only two polls that give us a precise pre-debate versus post-debate contrast reflect even more favorably on Obama than the eight tracking polls taken as a whole.

OK, here are the results broken down by poll. With two exceptions, which I'll explain shortly, these are from polling done on Thursday and published on Friday, and the number for each poll represents the change relative to polling done on Monday, the last pre-debate polling. Gallup: no change; IBD/TIPP: no change; Ipsos/Reuters: no change; PPP: Obama +2; RAND: Obama +4; Rasmussen: Obama +1; UPI/C-Voter: Obama +1; Washington Post/ABC: no change. [Notes: (1) The Ipsos/Reuters poll number, though reported today, actually includes some polling done today. (2) The UPI/C-Voter poll number is the same number I reported yesterday. I can't find an update for today, and, anyway, I now realize that the UPI number I reported yesterday was unusual in that it included polling done yesterday. So in that sense it is comparable to the other numbers I'm reporting today (except Ipsos/Reuters) in that the most recent polling it includes was done Thursday. All these polls can be found (in regularly updated form) here, except for RAND, which is here.]

Jump to comments
Presented by

Robert Wright is the author of, most recently, the New York Times bestseller The Evolution of God and a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize. He is a former writer and editor at The Atlantic. More

Wright is also a fellow at the New America Foundation and editor in chief of Bloggingheads.tv. His other books include Nonzero, which was named a New York Times Book Review Notable Book in 2000 and included on Fortune magazine's list of the top 75 business books of all-time. Wright's best-selling book The Moral Animal was selected as one of the ten best books of 1994 by The New York Times Book Review.Wright has contributed to The Atlantic for more than 20 years. He has also contributed to a number of the country's other leading magazines and newspapers, including: The New Yorker, The New York Times Magazine, Foreign Policy, The New Republic, Time, and Slate, and the op-ed pages of The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Financial Times. He is the recipient of a National Magazine Award for Essay and Criticism and his books have been translated into more than a dozen languages.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Tracing Sriracha's Origin to a Seaside Town in Thailand

Ever wonder how the wildly popular hot sauce got its name? It all started in Si Racha.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where the Wild Things Go

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.

Video

Adults Need Playtime Too

When was the last time you played your favorite childhood game?

Video

Is Wine Healthy?

James Hamblin prepares to impress his date with knowledge about the health benefits of wine.

Video

The World's Largest Balloon Festival

Nine days, more than 700 balloons, and a whole lot of hot air

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In