Tiny Explainer: The Budget Sequester

More

Unless Congress reaches a deal before January, the budget is slated to be cut with a blunt axe. Here's how the cuts will work.

It's one of those classic pieces of Washington jargon everyone uses but few really understand: the sequester.

Let's start at the beginning. As part of a deal to raise the debt ceiling in August 2011, congressional leaders agreed to increase the ceiling on borrowing on condition that the deficit be reduced. Democrats wanted to shrink it by increasing taxes on high earners (a revenue solution), while Republicans wanted to cut it by lowering spending. Both parties appointed members to a "supercommittee" charged with meeting in the middle to find a way to reduce the deficit by $1.2 billion.

As an incentive to reach a deal, the committee agreed that failure would lead to automatic budgets cuts of $600 billion starting in January -- half from defense*, and half from discretionary spending (basically, everything else, minus Social Security and Medicaid). The discretionary cuts would be taken proportionately from everything but Pell Grants, veterans' care, and Medicare. The idea was to endanger things that were widely popular with the public and dear to each party (defense for Republicans, other programs for Democrats). These automatic cuts are the "sequester," because the money is set aside for mandatory use.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the supercommittee did not reach a deal. Now, unless Congress can agree on a deficit reduction plan before January, the first-year cuts of $109 billion will kick in. Senate hawks like John McCain are particularly apoplectic about reduced Pentagon funding, but members of both parties are worried about the changes, and there have been discussions about legislation to repeal the sequester. President Obama has said he'll veto repeal bill, and demands that Congress either come up with its own cuts or else take the unpleasant medicine of the sequester. Mitt Romney has accused Obama of a failure of leadership and says the defense cuts would be disastrous.

For a more detailed but mostly plain-English description, read this paper from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.

Read more Tiny Explainers.

*Clarification: ProPublica's Justin Elliott notes that defense cuts will actually be $492 billion, not $600 billion. The remaining $108 billion reduction consists of interest payments that the Pentagon wouldn't have to make.

Jump to comments
Presented by

David A. Graham

David Graham is a senior associate editor at The Atlantic, where he oversees the Politics Channel. He previously reported for Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, and The National.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

How have stories changed in the age of social media? The minds behind House of Cards, This American Life, and The Moth discuss.


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In