Was the Ryan Appointment a Game-Changer? Not Really

More

This, according to one simple application that anyone with an Internet connection can access.

ryanfuturesban.jpg
Reuters

One way to help simplify life is to find a single source of information that summarizes a flood of others. For products I visit consumersearch.com; a New York Times article recently recommended thewirecutter.com. Fortunately, there's also a site that aggregates political information in the form of a market in which anybody can bet limited amounts of real money on outcomes. James Surowiecki summarized the theory here.

So when Paul Ryan was announced on Saturday as Mitt Romney's vice-presidential choice, I didn't try to follow the arguments of political mavens on the impact of the selection. I turned to the Iowa Electronic Markets, which had seen me through the 2008 primaries and general election. And the results were surprising:

After all the polemics on both sides, the general election futures contract prices have remained stuck at about 60-40 in Barack Obama's favor. Looking at the price history, the Ryan nomination barely registered on the IEM seismograph.

Romney supporters may claim there is some hidden bias against their candidate, but it wasn't apparent in the Republican primaries, in which their candidate took an early lead in the IEM.

Of course, many things can happen between now and the election, including gaffes and October surprises. And prediction markets can fail. Paul Ryan wasn't even listed on one Republican vice-presidential market as of August 9. But the IEM is probably the best aggregation of all the polls, newspaper and magazine articles, columns, blogs, and other information -- open and confidential -- and speculation on convention speakers and coverage, their likely rhetoric, and its impact.

The real question is not whether there is anything that either candidate can do to raise his Iowa futures price -- but instead, as I think more likely, whether only surprising economic news or an international crisis can change the odds significantly.

(For a classic example of a futures upset, see the  2008 Democratic nomination.)

Jump to comments
Presented by

Edward Tenner is a historian of technology and culture. He was a founding advisor of Smithsonian's Lemelson Center and holds a Ph.D in European history. More

Edward Tenner is an independent writer and speaker on the history of technology and the unintended consequences of innovation. He holds a Ph.D. in European history from the University of Chicago and was executive editor for physical science and history at Princeton University Press. A former member of the Harvard Society of Fellows and John Simon Guggenheim fellow, he has been a visiting lecturer at Princeton and has held visiting research positions at the Institute for Advanced Study, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, and the Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy. He is now an affiliate of the Center for Arts and Cultural Policy of Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School. He was a founding advisor of Smithsonian's Lemelson Center, where he remains a senior research associate.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Sad Desk Lunch: Is This How You Want to Die?

How to avoid working through lunch, and diseases related to social isolation.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where Time Comes From

The clocks that coordinate your cellphone, GPS, and more

Video

Computer Vision Syndrome and You

Save your eyes. Take breaks.

Video

What Happens in 60 Seconds

Quantifying human activity around the world

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

From This Author

Just In