Bill Kristol's Hypocritical 'Conservatism of Doubt'

More
He still thinks the American military can remake the Muslim world -- but lectures about delusions of rational control at home.



Eager to persuade Republicans that their inability to settle on a nominee isn't anything to worry about, Bill Kristol is embracing the conservatism of doubt:

We moderns like our roads direct, our destinations clear, our paths planned, our routes rational. But we delude ourselves. We presume to know in advance what cannot be known. We bask in the conceit of rational control when such control is not to be had. We're then disappointed, even angered, when we discover that life is in fact ​-- ​to quote those perceptive Oakeshottian critics of modernity, the Beatles​ -- ​a long and winding road. But long and winding roads can lead to worthwhile destinations. The limitations of modern rationalism don't preclude a reasonable outcome to our quest. Conservatives, of all people, shouldn't despair when the way forward turns out to be murky, and the ascent full of twists and turns. It's the modern left, after all, who are the terrible simplifiers.

Funny, when I think back on the most foolhardy and delusional oversimplification of the last decade -- the occasion when the conceit of rational control wreaked the most terrible havoc -- a leftist wasn't championing it.

Bill Kristol was.

For example, here he is in 2002 testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee:

American and alliance forces will be welcomed in Baghdad as liberators. Indeed, reconstructing Iraq may prove to be a less difficult task than the challenge of building a viable state in Afghanistan.

The political, strategic and moral rewards would also be even greater. A friendly, free, and oil-producing Iraq would leave Iran isolated and Syria cowed; the Palestinians more willing to negotiate seriously with Israel; and Saudi Arabia with less leverage over policymakers here and in Europe. Removing Saddam Hussein and his henchmen from power presents a genuine opportunity -- one President Bush sees clearly -- to transform the political landscape of the Middle East.

Analysis doesn't get more wrongheaded than that.

Has he acknowledged being spectacularly wrong? Or stopped agitating for more foreign wars, the outcomes of which -- given his spectacular history of bad predictions -- he has no reason to think he can know?

Nope.

He lectures others about "the conceit of rational control."

Heal thyself, Mr. Kristol.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

This Short Film Skewers Hollywood, Probably Predicts Disney's Next Hit

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

How Will Climate Change Affect Cities?

Urban planners and environmentalists predict the future of city life.

Video

The Inner Life of a Drag Queen

A short documentary about cross-dressing, masculinity, identity, and performance

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In