Why Ron Paul Should Accept Gold Donations

More

It would make perfect sense for him to want them, but the Fed-bashing libertarian congressman won't take your bullion

Gold bricks - Nguyen Huy Kham : Reuters - banner.jpg

If there's one thing Ron Paul loves, it's liberty. But if there are two things he loves, they are liberty and gold. Paul wants to return America to the gold standard and end the Federal Reserve's control of our fiat money, about which he wrote an entire book, accusing the Fed of villainously generating economic bubbles that one day will swallow our economy whole.

What better way, then, to support the congressman than by donating gold to his campaign?

Unfortunately, Paul won't take it, even if you try. "We only accept Federal Reserve notes," Paul's political director, Jesse Benton, told me.

The irony!

There is no legal reason why Paul's campaign cannot accept gold donations. Under federal election regulations, anything other than legal tender counts as an "in-kind" contribution; if a liberal caterer provides food for a Democratic fundraiser, for instance, the campaign reports the commercial value of the service. As the regulations are written, gold would count in just the same way.

Even more frustrating for the gold-owner who likes Ron Paul, there would be a monetary advantage for the campaign in taking gold donations. When a donor makes an "in-kind" contribution to a federal campaign, he/she tells the campaign how much it's worth at its present market value. The contribution cannot exceed the $2,500 contribution limit for federal candidates. This year, the price of gold has risen significantly. If Paul received a brick of gold, then waited a month or two and sold it, he could probably get more than $2,500 for it.

In short, Paul could simultaneously skirt federal contribution limits and stick it to the Federal Reserve. His refusal to do so is truly baffling.

Image credit: Nguyen Huy Kham/Reuters

Jump to comments
Presented by

Chris Good is a political reporter for ABC News. He was previously an associate editor at The Atlantic and a reporter for The Hill.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Why Are Americans So Bad at Saving Money?

The US is particularly miserable at putting aside money for the future. Should we blame our paychecks or our psychology?


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.

Video

How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe

Video

A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.

Video

I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In