What National Review Can Learn From George McGovern

He's been invoked to discredit Democrats since 1972, but proved more prescient than conservatives about war

mcgovern.jpg

The editors at National Review are among the best in America at ensuring that Ronald Reagan, the Republican Party's biggest political winner, is extolled; and that when Democratic politicians must be discussed, they are associated with an electoral loser, like Walter Mondale, Jimmy Carter, or especially the man who lost the 1972 presidential election in a landslide, U.S. Senator George McGovern. Says Rich Lowry, the magazine's editor, in "Obama's Latter-Day McGovernism," his most recent column, "when Obama took the podium last Friday to abruptly announce the imminent end of the Iraq War, he ended on a ringing McGovernite note: 'After a decade of war, the nation that we need to build -- and the nation that we will build -- is our own.'"

Since President Obama tried hard to keep troops in Iraq past the departure deadline that George W. Bush negotiated, I'd have thought that a comparison to McGovern, ultimately a champion of total withdrawal from Vietnam, wouldn't be possible. But Lowry was clever. Obama did talk of "building up the U.S.," just as McGovern did in his 1972 speech at the Democratic National Convention. "This is the time to turn away from excessive preoccupation overseas to the rebuilding of our own nation," McGovern said. "America must be restored to a proper role in the world. But we can do that only through the recovery of confidence in ourselves."

A McGovernite note!

As you probably know, "McGovernite" carries with it all sorts of negative connotations, hence its gratuitous use in the column's headline. It's a label of mockery, because the man, McGovern, lost big, and because his politics is associated with a far left-brand of soft-headed, naive pacifism.

Thus the two problems with Lowry's characterization. The smaller problem is that, while technically accurate to observe that the men struck an identical note in their speeches, it misleads the reader about the sort of foreign policy that President Obama has pursued to call it McGovernite.

And the bigger problem?

It's actually much bigger than Lowry's line, or his column, or his magazine. The problem is the way McGovern's name is invoked in American politics. It evokes a caricature more than a man; fails to separate how many states McGovern won from the quality of his foreign policy positions; ignores the fact that voters erred by re-electing Nixon, who'd resign in disgrace after an abuse of power that corrupted the democratic process itself; and most importantly, the way we invoke McGovern ignores the fact that on the biggest foreign policy question of his day, he was proven right!

And his antagonists were catastrophically wrong.   

Who was McGovern really? You'd never know, from the caricature, that he flew dozens of missions over Nazi territory in World War II, dropped bombs on Germany from the B-24 he piloted, once accidentally bombed a family farm, and earned the Distinguished Flying Cross. But never mind all that.

What's important is that he was one of the earliest voices in the House of Representatives to speak out against American involvement in the Vietnam War. "The current dilemma in Vietnam is a clear demonstration of the limitations of military power," he said in a speech during September of 1963 -- but despite his seeming prescience, he voted for the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. He'd soon deeply regret having done so, and from 1965 onward was a staunch critic of the war, though he still opposed both draft-card burning and the unilateral removal of US forces.

By 1972, he'd became even more convinced that America ought to get out as soon as possible. "In 1968 many Americans thought they were voting to bring our sons home from Vietnam in peace, and since then 20,000 of our sons have come home in coffins," he said in his convention speech. "I have no secret plan for peace. I have a public plan. And as one whose heart has ached for the past ten years over the agony of Vietnam, I will halt a senseless bombing of Indochina on Inaugural Day. There will be no more Asian children running ablaze from bombed-out schools. There will be no more talk of bombing the dikes or the cities of the North. And within 90 days of my inauguration, every American soldier and every American prisoner will be out of the jungle and out of their cells and then home in America where they belong."

Presented by

Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction.

The Blacksmith: A Short Film About Art Forged From Metal

"I'm exploiting the maximum of what you can ask a piece of metal to do."

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Riding Unicycles in a Cave

"If you fall down and break your leg, there's no way out."

Video

Carrot: A Pitch-Perfect Satire of Tech

"It's not just a vegetable. It's what a vegetable should be."

Video

An Ingenious 360-Degree Time-Lapse

Watch the world become a cartoonishly small playground

Video

The Benefits of Living Alone on a Mountain

"You really have to love solitary time by yourself."

Video

The Rise of the Cat Tattoo

How a Brooklyn tattoo artist popularized the "cattoo"

More in Politics

Just In