Perry Survives Battering at Tea-Party Debate

Republican candidates ganged up on the Texas governor, who stood his ground in the latest GOP presidential forum in Tampa, Fla.

Romney Perry FL debate - Scott Audette : Reuters - banner.jpg

Republican frontrunner Rick Perry backed up from his incendiary comments about the origins of Social Security. His closest rival, Mitt Romney, said he would nullify President Obama's health care law that resembles the one he passed in Massachusetts. And former Speaker Newt Gingrich, a firebrand while in Congress, said President Obama "scares" Americans "every single day."

It was a night for clarifications and amplifications for Republicans seeking the White House in an era of economic uncertainty and profound disillusionment with virtually all large national institutions. In ways large and small, each of the eight assembled GOP aspirants for the White House denounced what they suggested were the heavy-handed and overbearing ways of Beltway bureaucrats empowered and emboldened by Obama and his allies.

Perry, the current Texas governor, walked onto the CNN stage in Tampa, site of the Republican convention in August 2012, with a salute and promptly repeated his announcement-speech promise to make Washington "as inconsequential in your life as I can." In a debate co-sponsored by the Tea Party Express, that amounted to political catnip.

But Perry neither owned the stage nor dominated it. Romney and others did not hesitate to challenge the Texas governor on an array of issues, Romney striking first by citing Perry's description of Social Security as a "Ponzi scheme" and his suggestion that the popular retirement program is a violation of the Constitution and an affront to states' rights. Their spirited exchange, in a battleground state where seniors are a key voting bloc, was telling.

Social Security has been a solid program for "70 years" and said the term "Ponzi scheme" is "over the top and unnecessary and hurtful to many people," Romney said, and Perry's view that Social Security could or should be given back to the states was not only wrong-headed but politically injurious to the Republican Party. In a provocative challenge, Romney added: "The real question is does Gov. Perry continue to believe that Social Security should not be a federal program, that's it's unconstitutional and it should be returned to the states or is he going retreat from that view?"

Perry was undaunted. "If what you're trying to say is that back in the '30s and '40s that the federal government made all the right decisions, I disagree with you," the Texan said to applause. "It's time for us to get back to the Constitution. And a program that's been there 70 or 80 years, obviously we're not going to take that program away. But for people to stand up and support what they did in the 30s or what they are dong in the 2010s is not appropriate for America."

Romney pressed. "Do you still believe Social Security should be ended as a federal program as you did six months ago when your book came out and returned to the states? Or do you want to retreat from that?"

"I think we should have a conversation," Perry responded.

"We're having that right now, governor," retorted Romney. "We're running for president."

The governor of the state that includes the Alamo wasn't surrendering. "The issue is, are there ways to move the states into Social Security for state employees or for retirees? We did it in the state of Texas back in the 1980s. I think those kinds of thoughtful conversations with America, rather than trying to scare seniors like you're doing, it's time to have a legitimate conversation in this country about how to fix that program."

Romney wouldn't let it go.

"Governor, the term Ponzi scheme is what scared seniors," Romney said. "Suggesting that Social Security should no longer be a federal likewise frightening. That's your view. I happen to have a different one. I think that Social Security is an essential program and that we should change the way we are funding it."

Perry had dug up his own telling quote from a Romney book. "You called it criminal. You said if people did it in the private sector it would be called criminal. That's in your book." Romney may have pinned Perry's ears back and highlighted a general election issue some Republicans fear could haunt Perry, but the Texas governor's ready-fire retort won the tea party crowd and deprived Romney of an early debate equalizer.

In fact, if there was one recurrent theme in this second GOP presidential debate of September is that other challengers, trailing badly in the polls, were unafraid of Perry's apparent bulldozer popularity. Each candidate had their moment in the klieg lights. Romney, in addition to questioning Perry's stand on Social Security, questioned how much credit Perry should get for his state's economic success, saying the governor was "dealt four aces" in Texas: no state income tax, vast energy reserves, a GOP Legislature and GOP-led Supreme Court.

When asked if Perry deserved al the credit for Texas' solid job creation record, Rep. Ron Paul said "not quite." The Texas congressman complained that his taxes under Perry had "doubled" and noted that 170,000 new jobs in Texas were with the state government.

Presented by

Major Garrett is a congressional correspondent for National Journal.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus


A Stop-Motion Tour of New York City

A filmmaker animated hundreds of still photographs to create this Big Apple flip book


The Absurd Psychology of Restaurant Menus

Would people eat healthier if celery was called "cool celery?"


This Japanese Inn Has Been Open For 1,300 Years

It's one of the oldest family businesses in the world.


What Happens Inside a Dying Mind?

Science cannot fully explain near-death experiences.

More in Politics

Just In