The Manchester Lovefest

More

In tonight's CNN debate, the Republican candidates decided they all just want to get along

NH GOP debate 3 - S#1258A72.jpg

From the moment it began, tonight's CNN debate seemed more like a sprint than a marathon, as moderator John King tore through his questions like an over-caffeinated auctioneer. But all the energy and social-media accoutrements didn't seem to achieve a whole lot. There was little disagreement or confrontation between the candidates, despite King's best efforts to engender them.

This reluctance was especially pronounced with Tim Pawlenty, who yesterday attacked Mitt Romney's health care plan as "Obamneycare," but then repeatedly shrunk from that characterization when pressed on it by King. As a group, the candidates were staunchly conservative on social issues and highly critical of anything involving President Obama. (Asked if there were a single Obama action he agreed with, Ron Paul replied, "I can't think of one.")

In my view, Mitt Romney and Michele Bachmann turned in the best performances. Romney seemed comfortable and less wince-inducing than he normally is, kept his answers focused on the economy, and benefited from Pawlenty's (and the other candidates') unwillingness to challenge him.

Bachmann used the occasion of her first answer to announce that she was formally running for president. Then she turned a performance that was much more poised than some of her earlier campaign appearances, looking every bit as comfortable on the stage as Romney, and much more so than some of the other candidates. Relative to expectations, she probably had the best night. She managed to get across her conservative bona fides--twice voting against TARP, and pointing out that she did so "behind closed doors against my own party"--but without seeming wild-eyed or scary to moderates.

There was no small measure of awkwardness, but that was due chiefly to a steady stream of ridiculous questions from King, meant to "humanize" the candidates, that recalled the "boxers or briefs?" question once asked of Bill Clinton by MTV.

Overall, the debate seemed to establish that the battle for the GOP nomination will be fought on deeply conservative terrain. But it also suggested that the candidates aren't in any hurry to join that battle, at least not among themselves. The last segment of the debate degenerated somewhat oddly into a praisefest. In fact, there were probably more compliments exchanged tonight than attacks.

At some point, as the Iowa caucuses near, that will have to change. (Pawlenty in particular had better learn how to spar.) Or perhaps next week's polls will show Romney extending his lead, and that will force the field to get tougher on him. But until something happens to change the dynamic, the candidates seem content to campaign against Obama, and not against each other.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Joshua Green is a former senior editor at The Atlantic.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Why Are Americans So Bad at Saving Money?

The U.S. is particularly miserable at putting aside money for the future. Should we blame our paychecks or our psychology?


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.

Video

How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe

Video

A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.

Video

I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In