When Congress Wielded the War Power

More

With American lives under imminent threat, George Washington affirmed that the Commander-in-Chief cannot wage war without Congressional approval.    george washington full.jpg


During President Washington's tenure, Americans on the Southwest Frontier regularly clashed with tribes native to that region as our young nation began the process of seizing the continent. During the summer of 1791, for example, the Creek Indians - more properly called the Muskogee - joined with several other tribes to attack American settlers on the Cumberland River. The following year, settlers were regularly violating federal promises to stay off land that by treaty belonged to Indians. Governor of the Southwest Territory William Blount, who likely favored war with the Creek and other tribes, reported over 100 white settlers killed or taken captive in 1792. As the year wore on, so did attacks on settlers, and they continued apace in 1793.

That summer, President George Washington received a letter from the Governor of South Carolina, William Moultrie, written at a time when Americans had been attacked and killed, and additional attacks seemed imminent. Would the Commander In Chief please send his fellow citizens some help?

Here is how President Washington responded (emphasis added):

Philadelphia, August 28, 1793.
Dear Sir: I have received your letter of the 11th of the last month.
Having conceived an opinion highly favorable to General Pickens, I invited him to repair to this city, in order that I might obtain from him such facts and information as would be essential to an offensive expedition against the refractory part of the Creek Nation, whenever Congress should decide that measure to be proper and necessary. The Constitution vests the power of declaring war with Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject, and authorized such a measure.

So 218 years ago, the ratification of the Constitution having just occurred, the first president of the United States insisted in the face of raids on the homeland, and the virtual certainty of future attacks, that he couldn't commit to a military response without the permission of the United States Congress.

Yet in a memo dated April 1, 2011, President Obama's Office of Legal Counsel asserts (PDF) that the Commander in Chief is empowered to attack a North African country that poses no threat to our homeland "because he could reasonably determine that such use of force was in the national interest," and that "prior congressional approval was not constitutionally required to use military force in the limited operations under consideration."

This is how republics are lost.

Image via Flickr user Cliff1066


Drop-down bar thumbnail credit: Wikimedia Commons

Jump to comments
Presented by

Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

A Fascinating Short Film About the Multiverse

If life is a series of infinite possibilities, what does it mean to be alive?


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.

Video

How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe

Video

A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.

Video

I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In