Judicial Nominee Arvo Mikkanen Deserves Answers

Dear Washington:

Allow me to introduce myself. My name is Arvo Mikkanen.

I am sure you don't know me, especially if you don't live in Oklahoma. I grew up there, graduated from Yale Law School, returned to practice in the state and currently serve as an assistant U.S. Attorney in Oklahoma City. There, I have represented the United States in court in over 475 cases, both criminal and civil. Not that it should matter, but I am of Finnish descent, and Native American, too, and if confirmed by the Senate I would become only the third Native American federal judge in the nation's history. I am the current president of the Oklahoma Indian Bar Association and I clerked successfully for two federal judges when I was younger.

A few weeks ago, President Barack Obama placed my name into nomination for a vacant federal trial seat in Tulsa, Oklahoma. However, it appears as though the White House did not first consult about its choice with Oklahoma's Congressional delegation. Evidently, this is a breach of longstanding political protocol and, as a result, the two Republican senators in Oklahoma, as well as the lone Democratic House member there, immediately denounced my nomination. At the time, Sen. Tom Coburn called me "unacceptable for the position" and said he had "serious concerns" about me. Last week, he pronounced my nomination "dead."

There was something else the senator said last week that caught my attention. When asked last week to describe why he concluded so quickly and surely that I was "unacceptable" to become a federal judge, Sen. Coburn said: "No comment." When asked if he knew me, the senator said: "I know plenty. I have no comment." (My emphasis). Now, typically, judicial nominees are supposed to keep quiet during the long period between the time they are drafted to serve on the bench and the time they are confirmed (if they are confirmed). And I am not normally someone who rocks the boat (after all, you typically don't get to spend 17 years as a federal prosecutor if you rock the boat). But this is still America, and nominee or not, I still have a right to ask questions.

The first question I have today is for Sen. Coburn. What exactly do you think you know about me that disqualifies me for a spot on the bench? The implication of your quote last week--"I know plenty. I have no comment"--implies that you believe you have some non-public information that would cast a negative pall upon my nomination. So what is it? As a dedicated public servant, someone who has worked in the federal government longer than you have, I believe I am entitled to that answer; and then to be free of the dark insinuation your comment suggests. Even on a more basic level, as one man to another, you owe me an explanation, do you not? I am quite sure the White House also would like to know your response-- and so, too, would the millions of Native Americans, including many of your own constituents in Oklahoma, who have a particular interest in my nomination.

The second set of questions is for Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla), Sen Coburn and the rest of the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and the rest of the Senate. I would like to know whether the breach of protocol alleged against the White House in my case is why my nomination appears doomed. If that's the case, I would like to know how Oklahomans, especially those in Tulsa who have business in federal court, benefit from the Senate retaliating against the White House in this fashion. How does a further delay in filling that judicial seat help people? And if I'm not being rejected in a fit of senatorial pique, I would like to know which case I have ever worked on, or which cause I have ever promoted, makes me now "unacceptable" to be a federal judge?

Presented by

Andrew Cohen is a contributing editor at The Atlantic. He is a legal analyst for 60 Minutes and CBS Radio News, a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice, and Commentary Editor at The Marshall Project

Saving the Bees

Honeybees contribute more than $15 billion to the U.S. economy. A short documentary considers how desperate beekeepers are trying to keep their hives alive.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus


How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.


Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.


The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.


Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.


Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses


Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Politics

Just In