Absurd New York Times Suggestion of the Day

More

I enjoy Jon Stewart as much as the next guy, but suggesting, as today's New York Times does--and in a manner that leaves no doubt about its view--that the Daily Show anchor may be "the modern-day equivalent of Edward R. Murrow" because he spoke up for the 9/11 bill is just silly. Even the most wild-eyed lefty would have to pause before equating today's obstructionist Republicans with Joe McCarthy. And as commendable as it was for Stewart to speak up on behalf of the 9/11 bill, most commentators exaggerate how dire the bill's prospects were (Chuck Schumer would have demagogued it to passage with or without the Daily Show, I'd have bet money on it) in order to write yet another round of stories sanctifying Jon Stewart.

P.S. How cheap is it that the Times phrases the first two sentences of their story as questions? It's almost as if the paper was desperate to create the impression that Many Serious People were furiously debating the Murrow Question at salons and dinner parties everywhere--but couldn't quite bring themselves to make it a declarative because it isn't true.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Joshua Green is a former senior editor at The Atlantic.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Sad Desk Lunch: Is This How You Want to Die?

How to avoid working through lunch, and diseases related to social isolation.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where Time Comes From

The clocks that coordinate your cellphone, GPS, and more

Video

Computer Vision Syndrome and You

Save your eyes. Take breaks.

Video

What Happens in 60 Seconds

Quantifying human activity around the world

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In