For Democrats, It Could Have Been Worse

More

As bad a night as Democrats are going to have, it could have been much worse. Heck, it still might be much worse. We don't really know yet.  For a while, I've been trying to get final data on the Democratic National Committee's persuasion and targeting efforts to see just how many seats Democrats could have lost without the help of a strong party, a party that is, in essence, an organizational re-formation of an historic presidential campaign. Republicans do NOT have a strong party structure. The bulk of targeting efforts in several states is being conducted by outside groups.


The DNC's Organizing for America arm was never able to mobilize enough voters to match the relentless pulse of Republican enthusiasm, but it turns out that, in the past six months, they did a heck of a lot. President Obama's recent engagement with the election is one reason why Democratic enthusiasm has increased, but without the party to harness it, it would likely have dissipated. Make no mistake: If Democrats win Senate races in Pennsylvania, Colorado, and Nevada, the party gets some credit. 

The DNC pledged to spend $50 million on candidates directly. They spent $66 million, it turns out.  

The party's targeting efforts cost them $16 million. (No wonder: They had 300 separate microtargeting universes.) The party spent $3 million on outreach to black voters, $1 million on outreach to Hispanic voters (amid complaints they did not do enough), and millions on online campaigns. 

Adding in the amount of money the DNC raised for candidates, the total rises to $115 million. When all the numbers come in, expect the DNC to have raised more than $200 million.

And then there are the voter contacts: 75 million. (Most of these were duplicates.) But 75 million direct, voice-to-voice, person-to-person contacts. This weekend, 6.2 million voters were targeted. In the past four days, activists and volunteers worked 38,000 full shifts. Total shifts over six months: 188,580.

Today, volunteers will stage in more than 2,680 locations.

This bodes well for the party in one sense: 2012 should be an easier year, and the multiplier effect of their GOTV efforts will be larger when the environment is better. 
Jump to comments

Atlantic contributing editor Marc Ambinder is co-writing a book on national security and secrecy. More


Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Miami: The Next Big Start-Up City?

How the city became a center for innovation

Video

Video

A Brief History of Romantic Comedies

From The Atlantic's Chris Orr

Video

Video

Life in 'the New Arctic'

A moving portrait of a fading landscape

Video

Video

The Rise of New York City

A fascinating look at Manhattan in the 1940s

Video

'I Thought It Was Really Funny, but No One Else Did'

A day with New Yorker cartoonist Joe Dator

Video

New Yorkers: The Winemaker

Make your own wine ... in New York City

Video

What Is Methane Hydrate?

"Flaming ice" is a vast natural energy source

Video

NASA's Time-Lapse of the Sun

Now with epic dubstep music

Video

A Video Letter From the Editor

Highlights from the May 2013 issue

Video

Shaken Not Tuned: Cocktail Experiments

Can a tuning fork improve a cocktail?

Video

Video

The Rise of Environmentalism

Tracking 50 years, from the Love Canal disaster to Greenpeace

Video

Is He Cheating? A 1950s Guide

'That little blonde secretary from the office?’

Video

New Yorkers: Vintage Vacuum-Tube Amps

Risking electric shock to restore old amplifiers

Video

The DIY Piano-Bicycle

Everybody needs a hobby

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

In Focus

2013 National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest