Barack Obama's Scary Science

Great minds think alike; at least those of some Washington Post columnists do. Just three days after Michael Gerson took President Obama to task for "snobbery" and "pseudoscience" in remarks about the Democrats' flagging poll results, Charles Krauthammer chimes in to accusing Obama of disrespecting the "peasantry" with a newly invented "psychological derangement":

anxiety-induced Obama Underappreciation Syndrome, wherein an entire population is so addled by its economic anxieties as to be neurologically incapable of appreciating the 'facts and science' undergirding Obamacare and the other blessings their president has bestowed upon them from on high.

Let's look at the offending remarks Obama made at a recent fundraiser :

Part of the reason that our politics seems so tough right now and facts and science and argument does not seem to be winning the day all the time is because we're hardwired not to always think clearly when we're scared. And the country's scared.

Forget the merits and demerits of Obama policies. Every part of this statement is verifiable. Politics are tough. Many people are frightened. Fact, science, and argument don't always carry the day. Serious Republicans acknowledge this when they blame Democrats for bad science and excessive apprehension. And they can also recall the infamous anti-Goldwater daisy commercial in the 1964 campaign, and the hundreds of psychiatrists willing to declare the candidate unfit for office without having examined or even met him. (It led to a revision of the profession's code of ethics.) In this campaign, I've seen commercials in which both parties have exploited fear.

And fear does impair decision making. Even the libertarian Cato Institute's blog, gently correcting Krauthammer while agreeing with this main point, acknowledges this proposition. In fact, economic conservatives criticize the "precautionary principle" of avoiding all potential harm as based on an irrational degree of fear, for example of genetically modified plants and animals. As political rhetoric, Obama's statement may be pathetic when set beside Franklin Roosevelt's first inaugural ("fear itself -- nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance"). But it's no insult to his rational critics.

Presented by

Edward Tenner is a historian of technology and culture, and an affiliate of the Center for Arts and Cultural Policy at Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School. He was a founding advisor of Smithsonian's Lemelson Center.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus


A Stop-Motion Tour of New York City

A filmmaker animated hundreds of still photographs to create this Big Apple flip book


The Absurd Psychology of Restaurant Menus

Would people eat healthier if celery was called "cool celery?"


This Japanese Inn Has Been Open For 1,300 Years

It's one of the oldest family businesses in the world.


What Happens Inside a Dying Mind?

Science cannot fully explain near-death experiences.

More in Politics

From This Author

Just In