Boehner's Unforced Blunder

More

No two ways about it: the potential next speaker of the House, John Boehner, handed the Democrats a gift when he intimated that he would be open to voting for a bill that preserved the Bush tax cuts only for those making $250,000 or less. Boehner quickly tried to corral the horse and put it back in the barn, saying that he really didn't see a distinction between tax cuts ... that small business would be penalized by the refusal to extend the tax cuts for those making more than $250,000 and that he would not support legislation that would raise taxes on anyone.

"If the only option I have is to vote for those at $250,000 and below, of course I'm going to do that." Boehner said on CBS' "Face the Nation." "But I'm going to do everything I can to fight to make sure that we extend the current tax rates for all Americans."

It's still hard to see Democrats mustering the numbers to pass a bill doing this, but Boehner's comments might help prevent more Democrats from endorsing calls to extend the tax cuts for all Americans.

It may precipitate a leadership fight amongst Republicans if they retake control of the House, because a large number of new freshman GOPers are not going to want to compromise one iota with President Obama, specifically about tax cuts.

It's already precipitated a row (of sorts) within the caucus.

Boehner's comments remake the terms of a "broad compromise." Where progressive Democrats complained that "compromising" on tax cuts meant capitulating to Republican demands to extend them all, at least for a year, the "compromise" position on the table is now the one Obama proposed during his campaign. Also, it will reinforce doubts about Boehner's fundamental capacity to be a leader of a majority.

This solution also tracks with public opinion. Most Americans get the complexity of this issue: the Bush-era tax cuts were designed to stimulate the economy, and they had an expiration date because they would balloon the deficit too much if they were allowed to continue in perpetuity. Americans may understand, and even have some sympathy for, the argument that depriving people earning $250,000 or more of the marginal income tax rate they've used for the past few years might make it less attractive for small businesses to hire, but they don't see the A to B connection that Republicans have been using to energize their base.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Marc Ambinder is an Atlantic contributing editor. He is also a senior contributor at Defense One, a contributing editor at GQ, and a regular contributor at The Week.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

What Is a City?

Cities are like nothing else on Earth.


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

What Is a City?

Cities are like nothing else on Earth.

Video

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity

Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In