A Word More About Gary Hart

Yesterday I mentioned that Gary Hart has played a more consistently valuable role, over a longer span of years, on questions of national security and national values than the great majority of other public figures. Here are two items typical of the responses I've received. First, from Frank Van Haste

From 1979 to 1981 I worked in a department called Business Development Planning for the Electric Boat Division of General Dynamics. One of my tasks was to read SASC [Senate Armed Services Committee] hearing transcripts to glean anything that might bear on the submarine business. I quickly concluded that the committee was largely comprised of blithering idiots - except for Sen. Hart.

The deal was this: Any Senator could ask a good question - after all, they'd been fed them by bright young staffers. Gary Hart was the ONLY one who could ask a good follow-up question! It saddens me that his scintillating intellect has not had a greater influence on our body politic.

And from a former political supporter of Hart's:

Thanks for helping raise the profile of Hart again. I, too, was heavily involved in the 1972 McGovern campaign while in college and always respected Hart's understanding of diplomacy and the consequences of war. Hopefully, Obama, the current Congress, and the national media will give him a hearing to help develop a consistent and clearly communicated policy across a the complex range of national security challenges now in front of us.

Why bring this up now? Apart from giving Hart his retroactive due, we're again at a moment similar to the one that originally spawned his "defense reform" movement. As in the late 1970s we have: an obvious mismatch between the missions the American military has been assigned and the resources on which it can count in the long run; a level of political debate entirely unsuited to the complexities of this challenge; the pressures both good and bad of new technology, and the ever-shifting definitions of threats to national welfare. Plus now, more than 35 years into the volunteer army era, we have a much deeper separation between the professional military class and many other strata in American society. It would be good to have "another" Gary Hart to catalyze such discussions. But it's worth remember that we still have the original model on hand. (Photo from Yale Divinity School here.)

Presented by

James Fallows is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and has written for the magazine since the late 1970s. He has reported extensively from outside the United States and once worked as President Carter's chief speechwriter. His latest book is China Airborne. More

James Fallows is based in Washington as a national correspondent for The Atlantic. He has worked for the magazine for nearly 30 years and in that time has also lived in Seattle, Berkeley, Austin, Tokyo, Kuala Lumpur, Shanghai, and Beijing. He was raised in Redlands, California, received his undergraduate degree in American history and literature from Harvard, and received a graduate degree in economics from Oxford as a Rhodes scholar. In addition to working for The Atlantic, he has spent two years as chief White House speechwriter for Jimmy Carter, two years as the editor of US News & World Report, and six months as a program designer at Microsoft. He is an instrument-rated private pilot. He is also now the chair in U.S. media at the U.S. Studies Centre at the University of Sydney, in Australia.

Fallows has been a finalist for the National Magazine Award five times and has won once; he has also won the American Book Award for nonfiction and a N.Y. Emmy award for the documentary series Doing Business in China. He was the founding chairman of the New America Foundation. His recent books Blind Into Baghdad (2006) and Postcards From Tomorrow Square (2009) are based on his writings for The Atlantic. His latest book is China Airborne. He is married to Deborah Fallows, author of the recent book Dreaming in Chinese. They have two married sons.

Fallows welcomes and frequently quotes from reader mail sent via the "Email" button below. Unless you specify otherwise, we consider any incoming mail available for possible quotation -- but not with the sender's real name unless you explicitly state that it may be used. If you are wondering why Fallows does not use a "Comments" field below his posts, please see previous explanations here and here.

What LBJ Really Said About Selma

"It's outrageous what's on TV. It looks like that man is in charge of the country."


What LBJ Really Said About Selma

"It's going to go from bad to worse."


Does This Child Need Marijuana?

Inside a family's fight to use marijuana oils to treat epilepsy


A Miniature 1950s Utopia

A reclusive artist built this idealized suburb to grapple with his painful childhood memories.


Why Principals Matter

Nadia Lopez didn't think anybody cared about her school. Then the Internet heard her story.

More in Politics

From This Author

Just In