White House: Bill Clinton Was the Go-Between for Sestak

More

Sestak Memorandum.pdf


Basically: the notion that the White House offered Rep. Joe Sestak the job of Secretary of the Navy is false. The President had already nominated Ray Mabus for the job BEFORE Arlen Specter switched parties.

The White House, legitimately seeking to avoid a divisive primary, asked President Clinton to see if Sestak was serious about running. The White House wanted to try and offer Sestak an uncompensated advisory board position that would allow him to retain his House seat and use his years of public service to benefit himself and the country. But when Clinton reported back that Sestak was serious about running for Senate, the White House did not offer him any position. Sestak would not have been compensated for the position.

Additionally, as the White House knows, such practices are routine and, according to the White House, they do not in any violate the spirit or the letter of the law.

It is hard to see, quite frankly, how this account implies any violation of criminal law, and how any law that governs the intersection of the executive branch and electoral politics would intend to criminalize routine and innocuous political horse-trading, especially since the President is dual-hatted, in our system, as the leader of his political party. Bribery is bribery, but the facts here, assuming you believe them, and I do tend to believe them, are exculpatory.

If Rep. Sestak differs in his recollection, then the story will continue to be a story. If not, it won't be.

Here's what Richard Painter, the chief ethics law for President George W. Bush, had to say about the allegations BEFORE the White House released its memo:

The Hatch Act prohibits a federal employee from being a candidate for nomination or election to a partisan political office.  He had to choose one or the other, but he could not choose both.       The job offer may have been a way of getting Sestak out of Specter's way, but this also is nothing new.  Many candidates for top Administration appointments are politically active in the President's political party.  Many are candidates or are considering candidacy in primaries.  White House political operatives don't like contentious fights in their own party primaries and sometimes suggest jobs in the Administration for persons who otherwise would be contenders.  For the White House, this is usually a 'win-win' situation, giving the Administration politically savvy appointees in the Executive Branch and fewer contentious primaries for the Legislative Branch.  This may not be best for voters who have less choice as a result, and Sestak thus should be commended for saying 'no'.  The job offer, however, is hardly a 'bribe' when it is one of two alternatives that are mutually exclusive.
Jump to comments
Presented by

Marc Ambinder is an Atlantic contributing editor. He is also a senior contributor at Defense One, a contributing editor at GQ, and a regular contributor at The Week.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity

Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In