Arizona's Immigration Law Is Popular. Is Racial Profiling?

A CBS/New York Times poll finds that Arizona's new immigration law is, in fact, popular among the broader public: 51 percent say the law is "about right." From an April 28-May 2 survey (full results here) of 1,079 respondents, one of 76 questions asked:


Question 67.jpg
One might be tempted to surmise that the following question signals that Americans are okay with racial profiling, in the context of Arizona's law:

Question 68.jpg
So respondents believe Arizona's law will result in officers detaining people of a certain race (e.g. Hispanics) more frequently as a result of the bill. And most respondents like the new law. Ergo, they're okay with officers disproportionately stopping Hispanics, as one of the law's consequences.

Sounds a lot like racial profiling.

But Pollster.com's Brendan Nyhan warns that such a reading is misguided. The question isn't whether more Hispanics will get stopped; rather, it's whether the law will lead officers to detain people solely based on their ethnic backgrounds--to use race as a determining factor in deciding whom to stop--the definition of racial profiling.

The Arizona law initially prohibited officers from such intentional profiling.

The first version of the law, which Gov. Jan Brewer signed on April 23, provided in multiple instances that "a law enforcement official or agency of this state or a county, city, town or other political subdivision of this state may not solely consider race, color or national origin in implementing the requirements of this subsection except to the extent permitted by the United States or Arizona Constitution."

The word "solely" was stricken from the law in an updated, follow-on version Brewer signed April 30. Now, officers are prohibited from considering race, period, when enforcing the new law, except as permitted by the U.S. and AZ Constitutions.

Critics of the law, needless to say, think racial profiling is exactly what will happen--but also that Hispanics will be stopped erroneously, regardless if their race is the motivating factor. Officers probably won't be stopping a lot of white people, since all illegal Mexican immigrants are, by definition, Mexican--meaning most of them will be Hispanic--thus almost all of the erroneous stops, the collateral damage of enforcing Arizona's new law, will be inflicted upon the Hispanic population.

Nyhan is right that the NYTimes/CBS question doesn't address intent. It doesn't show that poll respondents are okay with officers using race to determine whom to stop.

And given that a vast majority of illegal immigrants are, in fact, Hispanic, perfect enforcement of this law--with no one getting stopped erroneously--would mean that, yes, Hispanics would be detained disproportionately to other ethnic groups.

Whether the poll's respondents thought about it that way, or whether they're just okay with some collateral police detainment of Hispanics as this law gets enforced, I suppose is up for debate.
Presented by

Chris Good is a political reporter for ABC News. He was previously an associate editor at The Atlantic and a reporter for The Hill.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

The Best 71-Second Animation You'll Watch Today

A rock monster tries to save a village from destruction.

Video

The Case for Napping at Work

Most Americans don't get enough sleep. More and more employers are trying to help address that.

Video

A Four-Dimensional Tour of Boston

In this groundbreaking video, time moves at multiple speeds within a single frame.

Video

Who Made Pop Music So Repetitive? You Did.

If pop music is too homogenous, that's because listeners want it that way.

Video

Stunning GoPro Footage of a Wildfire

In the field with America’s elite Native American firefighting crew

More in Politics

Just In