Brit Debate: Two Points

I will leave to Andrew Sullivan, who has the advantage of being an actual Englishman, the live-blogging duties for the Brown-Cameron-Clegg debate. But from having watched and written about a zillion of these things in American politics (eg here and here and here and here), let me make two quick points while seeing the BBCAmerica live stream:

1. This really is different from a US presidential debate, because (based on my half hour's exposure) it really is about policies and arguments. Or if you prefer, slogans -- but in any case, the speakers are mainly addressing each other, rather than (as is often sane for US candidates) performing in sequential solos to the camera. The timeless -- and accurate -- lore of US political debates is that they're not about policies. They are about the public's getting a sense of the person and deciding how they feel about him or her. That may be good and it may be bad, but it's how things are. The Brits so far may not really be advancing the overall level of public knowledge, but they're acting as if policy differences are the point of the exchange, rather than scoring one of the "You're no Jack Kennedy" "There you go again"-type dramatic moments on which US debates have often turned.

2. Gordon Brown is really, really terrible as a public figure. Every time he wags his head scoldingly "No, No" when the opponents are speaking, he must lose another 500 votes. No policy judgment here. Just saying that -- based on this sample, plus these past few days' "bigot" disaster -- this is someone with neither aptitude nor (apparently) training as a TV-era public figure. The more that the general election becomes "presidential," the harder it is to imagine that people will choose to have him around for a few more years as the main figure to listen to in the news.

That is all. Over to Andrew.

UPDATE: Brown's final words, which were also the final words of the debate, were a quite attention-getting "a week from now, I will be out of office" (in not exactly that form). It was an emotional roll of the dice but -- I say based on zero knowledge of the dynamics of the British electorate -- likely at best to add a note of pathos rather than to draw much support.

Presented by

James Fallows is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and has written for the magazine since the late 1970s. He has reported extensively from outside the United States and once worked as President Carter's chief speechwriter. His latest book is China Airborne. More

James Fallows is based in Washington as a national correspondent for The Atlantic. He has worked for the magazine for nearly 30 years and in that time has also lived in Seattle, Berkeley, Austin, Tokyo, Kuala Lumpur, Shanghai, and Beijing. He was raised in Redlands, California, received his undergraduate degree in American history and literature from Harvard, and received a graduate degree in economics from Oxford as a Rhodes scholar. In addition to working for The Atlantic, he has spent two years as chief White House speechwriter for Jimmy Carter, two years as the editor of US News & World Report, and six months as a program designer at Microsoft. He is an instrument-rated private pilot. He is also now the chair in U.S. media at the U.S. Studies Centre at the University of Sydney, in Australia.

Fallows has been a finalist for the National Magazine Award five times and has won once; he has also won the American Book Award for nonfiction and a N.Y. Emmy award for the documentary series Doing Business in China. He was the founding chairman of the New America Foundation. His recent books Blind Into Baghdad (2006) and Postcards From Tomorrow Square (2009) are based on his writings for The Atlantic. His latest book is China Airborne. He is married to Deborah Fallows, author of the recent book Dreaming in Chinese. They have two married sons.

Fallows welcomes and frequently quotes from reader mail sent via the "Email" button below. Unless you specify otherwise, we consider any incoming mail available for possible quotation -- but not with the sender's real name unless you explicitly state that it may be used. If you are wondering why Fallows does not use a "Comments" field below his posts, please see previous explanations here and here.


A Stop-Motion Tour of New York City

A filmmaker animated hundreds of still photographs to create this Big Apple flip book


The Absurd Psychology of Restaurant Menus

Would people eat healthier if celery was called "cool celery?"


This Japanese Inn Has Been Open For 1,300 Years

It's one of the oldest family businesses in the world.


What Happens Inside a Dying Mind?

Science cannot fully explain near-death experiences.

More in Politics

From This Author

Just In