|
|
« Previous Politics | Next Politics » |
|
Defending The White House
By
The White House has found at least one defender in its war against Fox News; while the rest of her media colleagues pounced on the administration's gall in attacking the organization, Politics Daily Editor in Chief Melinda Hennenberger writes:
Of course, the rest of the media hasn't shared this reaction--which, in some ways, has been surprising. A significant chunk of the media itself has been known, from time to time, to complain about Fox: people who work in the media share most of the complaints everyone else has about the industry's own tics and tendencies--including the often vapidity of the 24-hour news cycle and, yes, the conservative leanings of Fox News, though most of the criticism is aimed at Fox's pundits, not its straight-style reporters.
But those who work in the media are also media apologists, and, if there's one thing they dislike more than a perceived ideological slant, it's the threat of a freeze-out and the leveraging of public office's powers--e.g., the White House's bully pulpit--against a news outlet.
More media figures probably shared Hennenberger's opinion of Fox before all this started. A lot of them probably still do, even as they criticize the White House.
My own reaction, on the other hand, was: Finally! And: How about saying some more true things, now that you're on such a roll?
Of course, the rest of the media hasn't shared this reaction--which, in some ways, has been surprising. A significant chunk of the media itself has been known, from time to time, to complain about Fox: people who work in the media share most of the complaints everyone else has about the industry's own tics and tendencies--including the often vapidity of the 24-hour news cycle and, yes, the conservative leanings of Fox News, though most of the criticism is aimed at Fox's pundits, not its straight-style reporters.
But those who work in the media are also media apologists, and, if there's one thing they dislike more than a perceived ideological slant, it's the threat of a freeze-out and the leveraging of public office's powers--e.g., the White House's bully pulpit--against a news outlet.
More media figures probably shared Hennenberger's opinion of Fox before all this started. A lot of them probably still do, even as they criticize the White House.
Presented by





























Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus