White House Very Skeptical About "Second Stimulus"

More
More Congressional Democrats voiced concerns today about the pace of the economic recovery, but the White House is holding firm against the idea of a second major stimulus intervention. Two administration officials say the President will wait at least six months before deciding whether to support a second stimulus package. Still, some administration officials and allies concede that two tactical errors were committed during the stimulus battle, although they were perhaps unavoidable. As the Vice President said this weekend, White House economists underestimated how bad things were (as did everyone else, of course, aside from a privileged few.)  Secondly, and perhaps more pertinent to today's debate, officials arguably oversold the stimulus package's inherent efficiency. Their words and deeds differed; the administration was careful to say that the economic recovery wouldn't be instantaneous, but, at the same time, it was politically critical to sell the stimulus by highlighting how quickly certain monies would be spent.  ("Shovel ready" conjures up a picture of a worker, with a shovel in hand, waiting for the green light. The reality is more prosaic.)


That said, there is no appetite at the White House for a second bite at the apple. The government cannot handle any more money...federal employees are working as fast as they can to get the money out. When it comes to effective spending with a multiplier effect, there aren't that many projects that are underfunded. More spending would create a bottleneck, unless the White House endorsed direct transfer payments to people, either in the form of welfare, tax cuts, or both. Congressional liberals could stomach the deficit fight, but Congress can't, and the White House won't.

Perception drives reality: including the industry bailouts and the 2009 omnibus budget bill, the federal government has acted to stimulate to the economy no less than thrice. The administration agrees with Megan McArdle: passing a health care bill is tantamount to a "second" (or fifth) intervention. 

Whether they sustain this position will test Obama's ironclad commitment to hold steady in the face of regular congressional (and even public) panics. And lest you wonder, White House officials are very much watching the new statewide polling data showing a drop in support among independent voters.

Jump to comments

Atlantic contributing editor Marc Ambinder is co-writing a book on national security and secrecy. More


Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Miami: The Next Big Start-Up City?

How the city became a center for innovation

Video

Video

A Brief History of Romantic Comedies

From The Atlantic's Chris Orr

Video

Video

Life in 'the New Arctic'

A moving portrait of a fading landscape

Video

Video

The Rise of New York City

A fascinating look at Manhattan in the 1940s

Video

'I Thought It Was Really Funny, but No One Else Did'

A day with New Yorker cartoonist Joe Dator

Video

New Yorkers: The Winemaker

Make your own wine ... in New York City

Video

What Is Methane Hydrate?

"Flaming ice" is a vast natural energy source

Video

NASA's Time-Lapse of the Sun

Now with epic dubstep music

Video

A Video Letter From the Editor

Highlights from the May 2013 issue

Video

Shaken Not Tuned: Cocktail Experiments

Can a tuning fork improve a cocktail?

Video

Video

The Rise of Environmentalism

Tracking 50 years, from the Love Canal disaster to Greenpeace

Video

Is He Cheating? A 1950s Guide

'That little blonde secretary from the office?’

Video

New Yorkers: Vintage Vacuum-Tube Amps

Risking electric shock to restore old amplifiers

Video

The DIY Piano-Bicycle

Everybody needs a hobby

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

In Focus

2013 National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

Just In