White House: Health Reform Will Lower Costs

More

This is a political argument masquarading as an economic argument.  The White House is prepared to say today that reducing health care costs by 1.5% a year will increase gross domestic product by 8% over what it would otherwise be in 2030 and that providing insurance to those who don't have it amount to a net "welfare" effect of more than $100 billion. CEA Health Care Report Embargoed.pdf

A new report, previewed for reporters by Council of Economic Adviser chair Christina Romer, makes the case that doing health care reform properly is incredibly important for the economy. Makes a broadening of the White House argument, which has focused largely on access, to the economic benefits of reducing long-term costs.

The report documents the amount of inefficiences in the system and suggests some ways to reduce costs. The suggestions aren't specific because the White House "doesn't want to get ahead of the legislative process," Romer said. "The slowing of costs is certainly going to be challenging," she said.

Promoting the creation of small businesses might reduce insurance premiums over the long-term, especially if these businesses are given the ability to pool their employees and bargain with insurance companies.

The support suggests that reversing "job lock" -- where people with insurance don't leave bad jobs for better ones because they're worried about insurance -- will provide tangible economic benefits. (No discussion here of portability.)

Responding to an argument that subsidizing health care premiums results in an aggregate job supply decline, the report contends that such effects are likely to be "modest."

Expanding coverage to everyone could save as much as $65 billion a year in reduced mortality.

The report is vague about cost-cutting measures. In a moment of candor, Romer -- who, come to think of it, is usually fairly candid, admitted that "[c]hanging the incentives for providers depends much less on getting everyone covered" -- that is, health reform that focuses on access, which is what Congress and the White House are working on, won't do much of anything to contain costs. Romer said her report intended to look "beyond that" short term period.

>

Jump to comments
Presented by

Marc Ambinder is an Atlantic contributing editor. He is also a senior contributor at Defense One, a contributing editor at GQ, and a regular contributor at The Week.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

'Cattoo': The Rise of the Cat Tattoo

"Feline art is really popular right now," says a tattoo artist in Brooklyn.


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Why Do People Love Times Square?

A filmmaker asks New Yorkers and tourists about the allure of Broadway's iconic plaza

Video

A Time-Lapse of Alaska's Northern Lights

The beauty of aurora borealis, as seen from America's last frontier

Video

What Do You Wish You Learned in College?

Ivy League academics reveal their undergrad regrets

Video

Famous Movies, Reimagined

From Apocalypse Now to The Lord of the Rings, this clever video puts a new spin on Hollywood's greatest hits.

Video

What Is a City?

Cities are like nothing else on Earth.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In