Washington Post and RNC Pave The Road to Socialism

It's mildly frustrating that when the Washington Post has a chance to interview Tim Geithner, the Secretary of the United States Treasury, the first question they ask about the administration's policies is: "How is this not socialism?" But it is surely just one big, festering national embarrassment that that the Republican Party actually considered a resolution to rename the Democratic Party the "Democrat Socialist Party" and passed a resolution urging the Democrats to "stop pushing our country towards socialism and governmental control."


The problem with the socialism tactic -- and it is quite obviously just a desperate tactic -- is that it relies not on any strange new insight into the administration, but instead rests entirely on a strange new definition of the word socialism. It's a tactic that proceeds by misinformation, and can end only with a confused public or a new definition of the word in question.

And since the public has been warming up to the word ever since the McCain campaign called Barack Obama a socialist for supporting the progressive income tax, I assume we are on the road to a new definition. Which is fine, really, since it's possible to imagine a world in which "socialism" refers to method for making ice cream or healing puppies. The word still wouldn't give any additional insight into Barack Obama, or Republicans any edge in the next election.

Schumpeter - capitalism, socialism & democracy.jpg

On a slightly unrelated note, it wasn't always this way. When Joseph Schumpeter made his famous prediction in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy that capitalism was doomed to fail and socialism was destined to rise, it was a time (1942) in which a plurality, if not a majority, of the world's people were living under totalitarian or communist governments. Schumpeter asked, "Can capitalism survive?" and answered, simply and worryingly, "No." Turns out he was wrong, but at least it was plausible.    

We're now living in a world in which a plurality of the world's people, if not a majority, are living under some species of capitalist democracy. I don't know if that's an inevitable result of human destiny, but the road to socialism is certainly looking a lot less plausible than it did 70 years ago. Republicans are looking increasingly ridiculous for suggesting it.

The cover image of Capitalism Socialism and Democracy is from Amazon.com

Presented by

Conor Clarke is the editor, with Michael Kinsley, of Creative Capitalism. He was previously a fellow at The Atlantic and an editor at The Guardian. More

Conor Clarke is the editor, with Michael Kinsley, of Creative Capitalism, an economics blog that was recently published in book form by Simon and Schuster. He was previously a fellow at The Atlantic and an editor at The Guardian. He is also on Twitter.

Saving the Bees

Honeybees contribute more than $15 billion to the U.S. economy. A short documentary considers how desperate beekeepers are trying to keep their hives alive.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.

Video

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Video

The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.

Video

Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.

Video

Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Politics

Just In