Why are State Taxes Less Progressive?

Oregon is planning to raise its tax on beer by 1,900%, which seems like both an irresistible tax-day story and a good chance to write about the differences between state and federal taxes.

In general taxes on consumption goods with negative externalities -- like cigarettes and gasoline and, arguably, alcohol -- are desirable. But taxes on non-luxury consumption goods also tend to be regressive: Bill Gates might be worth a million times as much as the average American, but he does not, alas, consume a million times as much beer. Probably not even half that.


States taxes lean towards sales and consumption more than federal taxes, which is why, when you consider the overall tax distribution by income, instead of simply the federal tax burden by income, the tax code looks less progressive than it otherwise would (H/T Ezra Klein and Catherine Rampell):

550 total effective tax rates.jpg

The organization that put together this nice chart, Citizens For Tax Justice, uses it to make the point that effective tax rates are "not significantly higher" for the rich than for the middle class, and that the tax system as a whole is "not as progressive as you think." I'd say that's a matter of interpretation. The tax code is obviously still progressive. Coming to a conclusion -- "too progressive," "not progressive enough," etc -- isn't something you can do with a chart.

The other thing that's worth noting about this chart is slight dip in effective rates for the top 4% and top 1%. As I understand it, this has nothing to do with state taxes and everything to do with the fact that the wealthiest Americans get a huge portion of their income from dividends and capital gains, which are taxed at a lower rate. That's the classic Warren Buffett complaint about the tax code.

Presented by

Conor Clarke is the editor, with Michael Kinsley, of Creative Capitalism. He was previously a fellow at The Atlantic and an editor at The Guardian. More

Conor Clarke is the editor, with Michael Kinsley, of Creative Capitalism, an economics blog that was recently published in book form by Simon and Schuster. He was previously a fellow at The Atlantic and an editor at The Guardian. He is also on Twitter.

Saving the Bees

Honeybees contribute more than $15 billion to the U.S. economy. A short documentary considers how desperate beekeepers are trying to keep their hives alive.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.

Video

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Video

The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.

Video

Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.

Video

Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Politics

Just In