Skip Navigation
Conor Clarke

Conor Clarke - Conor Clarke is the editor, with Michael Kinsley, of Creative Capitalism. He was previously a fellow at The Atlantic and an editor at The Guardian. More

Conor Clarke is the editor, with Michael Kinsley, of Creative Capitalism, an economics blog that was recently published in book form by Simon and Schuster. He was previously a fellow at The Atlantic and an editor at The Guardian. He is also on Twitter.

More Ways to Cheat the Geithner Plan?

By Conor Clarke
Apr 3 2009, 4:15 PM ET Comment

The FT reports that big banks are thinking of buying each other's toxic assets with the government subsidy:

US banks that have received government aid, including Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase, are considering buying toxic assets to be sold by rivals under the Treasury's $1,000bn (£680bn) plan to revive the financial system.

The plans proved controversial, with critics charging that the government's public-private partnership - which provide generous loans to investors - are intended to help banks sell, rather than acquire, troubled securities and loans.

But if the government doesn't want certain institution's to participate as buyers, it doesn't have to let them. It can reject applicants under the legacy securities half of the program, and it can restrict the bidding under the legacy loans side of the program. What's interesting about the plan above is that the government isn't necessarily opposed to it, because it thinks there is useful price discovery information to be obtained by letting banks bid on each other's assets. One capital market adviser with knowledge of the plan writes:


The interesting point is that the article claims the Treasury and FDIC are considering allowing banks to bid on each others assets as part of a price discovery mechanism. That is, reshuffle these assets among the banks and in the process generate pricing info. Obviously, there's the potential for banks to collude behind the scenes and agree to bid at inflated levels to mutually bolster each others balance sheet. And because the purchase is made with FDIC insured debt, the net effect is the FDIC guaranteeing the performance of assets similar to those that were once on the bank's balance sheet.

I think PE and hedge fund investors will lobby against this, as it creates the potential to inflate the prices they'll have to pay. Given that some pretty major players have expressed in interest (e.g., PIMCO), that resistance will probably not be taken lightly.
Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The fEARLESSness of Jeremy Lin The Fearlessness of Jeremy Lin
The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet
Politics Q&A: Senator Rand Paul Rand Paul: 'You Don't Go Into Politics Unless You Want to Win'
Third Grade Again: The Trouble With Holding Students Back The Trouble With Holding Students Back
Mutts Mobilize in Midtown Against Mitt Mutts Mobilize in Midtown Against Mitt

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Next Global Economies Reuters The Next Global Economies
Lessons from the BRICs — and a look at which developing countries are on the rise. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)