Ask the Editors: Four Problems With Bank Nationalization

More

I'll post a few more tomorrow, but here's one for now. JohnGalt asks:

What's wrong with nationalization?

I have the impression that the people most opposed to it are not the middle/poor class but the business elite. [...] Anything else?

Yes! In particular, four objections tend to pop up:


1. The big problem is the risk of contagion: It might be difficult to limit nationalization to only a couple of banks. If the government wipes out the shareholders of a few insolvent institutions, it will reduce the incentive for private capital to flow into banks that are wobbling but still upright. (Why invest in such institutions if the government can just come in and wipe you out?) Nationalizing a couple of banks might set off a reaction that will require nationalizing many more.

On top of that, there are a few other worries about nationalization. I have trouble knowing how much weight to give to each of these arguments. But here they are:

2. There is little historical precedent for large-scale nationalization. (And while lack of precedent isn't really an argument against anything, it suggests that we should approach the issue with skepticism and humility.)

3. Taking over multiple banks will present the government with a very complicated management problem. The degree to which this worries you will probably track the degree to which you trust government managers to be competent, accountable, etc.

4. There is the risk that political pressure will taint the market for loanable funds. (And even if actual political pressure doesn't enter the picture, the perception of political pressure almost certainly will.)

Jump to comments
Presented by

Conor Clarke is the editor, with Michael Kinsley, of Creative Capitalism. He was previously a fellow at The Atlantic and an editor at The Guardian. More

Conor Clarke is the editor, with Michael Kinsley, of Creative Capitalism, an economics blog that was recently published in book form by Simon and Schuster. He was previously a fellow at The Atlantic and an editor at The Guardian. He is also on Twitter.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

The Remote Warehouse Where Confiscated Wildlife Ends Up

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Is Wine Healthy?

James Hamblin prepares to impress his date with knowledge about the health benefits of wine.

Video

The World's Largest Balloon Festival

Nine days, more than 700 balloons, and a whole lot of hot air

Video

The Origins of Bungee Jumping

"We had this old potato sack and I filled it up with rocks and dropped it over the side. It just hit the water, split, dropping all the stones. And that was our test."

Video

Is Trading Stocks for Suckers?

If you think you’re smarter than the stock market, you’re probably either cheating or wrong

Video

I Spent Half My Life Making a Video Game

How a childhood hobby became a labor of love

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In