|
|
« Previous Politics | Next Politics » |
|
The Politics Of The Citibank Tango
ByToday, regulators, Treasury officials and bank executives are working through a plan that would inject the bank with billions in new capital. At the same time, they're asking Wall Street to calm its collective nervous system. The government won't pull Citibank into receivership, but a jittery stock market might force their hand.
A senior administration official said that the goal in issuing an
extraordinary statement this morning asserting that Citibank was "well
capitalized" was both reassurance and pressure: "We are not rushing
towards nationalization at all," the official said. "But capital
flight requires capital infusion." The worst thing that could happen,
from Treasury's point of view, is that a major sell-off would force the
bank into receivership by pulling the price down to a buck or below.
"All these Jim Cramers crowing about the free market need to put up or shut up," the official said.
Citigroup's
market capitalization is around $11.25 billion dollars right now, and
its shares trading at around $2.15 cents. The government already owns
$45 billion worth of Citigroup preferred stock -- about 25% of the
bank's overall equity.
The government proposes to convert its
preferred stock into common equity, which poses a problem: it'll be
very hard for the government to retain less than 40% ownership stakes
when the conversions are complete; the conversion price would have to
be around $20 dollars per common share, which is almost ten times as
much as a common share is now worth. In theory, the government can
set an arbitrary conversion price, but that level of intervention would
be precarious. So -- the government wants to talk up the price of
Citigroup stocks and it can talk up the price a bit.
A Citigroup
official said that the company and the government are working on the
specific convertible formula. Because the conversion terms would dilute
the existing pool of stock, "The question we're trying to answer is
whether this is something that would need shareholder approval," the
Citigroup official said. An annual meeting is scheduled for April.
If
all of this internal maneuvering smacks of government control over
Citigroup, that's because the government essentially has the leverage
it needs right now. And this informal arrangement is mutually
beneficial. The government gets to restructure the bank without
acquiring majority ownership stakes; Citigroup remains private and gets
to rebut claims that it is insolvent. They can take more government
money if they're worried about the stress tests, but as of today, the
government considers Citibank well capitalized.






























Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus