Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Iraq and the Candidates

By Matthew Yglesias
May 21 2008, 8:19 AM ET Comment

transportplane.jpg

Jon Chait has an interesting article arguing that we shouldn't take the candidates rhetoric about forward-looking Iraq policy all that seriously -- both have incentives to try to outline crystal clear positions but, in reality, both would need to respond to some extent to events on the ground.

That's all very true, but at the same time I think we're in danger of seeing a tendency toward the smart set actually underestimating the extent of disagreement between Obama and McCain. Part of this is much is being made of the fact that some public statements by some Obama advisors seem to indicate that they are less enthusiastic about speedy withdrawal from Iraq than the candidate's stated vision seems to imply. A big deal gets made out of this because it's a newsworthy admission against interest type of thing. A less big deal gets made out of the fact that there are actually a lot of other people associated with the Obama camp who completely agree with Obama's rhetoric on Iraq. Something like "Obama Advisor Agrees With Obama Position" makes for a terrible article so you get less coverage of the fact that Obama really might just listen to Brian Katulis and Larry Korb and leave Iraq.

More broadly, though, Jon's article has been given the unfortunate subhead "Ignore what candidates say about foreign policy" even though that's not what the argument of the column says. But of course "foreign policy" is not equivalent to "ideas about appropriate force levels in Iraq in October of 2009." Foreign policy includes our relationships with Russia, China, India, Japan and the European allies. It includes our approach to Syria and North Korea. It certainly includes our approach to, say, Iran and it's clear enough that McCain and Obama have different ideas about Iran. But the course of U.S.-Iranian relations will have a big impact on America's Iraq policy. The causal line here isn't totally predictable -- Obama's Iraq policy will depend, in part, on the outcome of his efforts at diplomacy with Iran, but we can't know what that outcome will be. On the one hand, that supports Jon's point that there's a lot of uncertainty here. But at the same time, there are meaningful differences -- Obama might work out a good accommodation with Iran but McCain almost certainly won't, whereas McCain might blunder into a larger war with Iran while Obama almost certainly won't.

U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Jeffrey Allen

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

9 fACES of the New Egypt 9 Faces of the New Egypt
The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet
'Plug In Better': A Manifesto Plug In Better
The fEARLESSness of Jeremy Lin The Fearlessness of Jeremy Lin
The 10 Best and 10 Worst States for High-Tech Business The Top High-Tech Business States

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Next Global Economies Reuters The Next Global Economies
Lessons from the BRICs — and a look at which developing countries are on the rise. Read more ›

Just In

View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Valentine's Day 2012

Feb 14, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)