Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Did McCain Vote for Bush

By Matthew Yglesias
May 6 2008, 1:13 PM ET Comment

Arianna Huffington says John McCain told her shortly after the 2000 election that he didn't vote for George W. Bush, McCain's camp now denies this which prompted this funny rejoinder from Huffington about McCain's history of denying he did things he clearly did:

He denied ever talking with John Kerry about his leaving the GOP to be Kerry's '04 running mate -- then later admitted he had, insisting: "Everybody knows that I had a conversation." He denied admitting that he didn't know much about economics, even though he'd said exactly that to the Wall Street Journal. And the Boston Globe. And the Baltimore Sun. He denied ever having asked for a budget earmark for Arizona, even though he had. On the record. He denied that he'd ever had a meeting with comely lobbyist Vicki Iseman and her client Lowell Paxon, even though he had. And had admitted it in a legal deposition.


Clearly, I don't know what McCain did or didn't do in the voting booth in 2000, but considering the position she was taking at the time it does seem like the logical thing to do would have been for McCain to support Gore. In 2000, after all, Bush's signature initiative was a tax cut proposal that, at at the time, McCain opposed -- just like Gore. Similarly, McCain's signature initiative was a campaign finance reform proposal that Bush opposed but Gore favored. On foreign policy, I don't think a clear differentiation emerged between Bush and Gore, but many construed Bush's rhetoric as calling for a retrenchment of American commitments abroad at a time when McCain was calling to expand them and adopt "rogue state rollback" as a signature issue. Gore's running mate was Joe Lieberman, who's clearly someone McCain adores. As a career Republicans, you could imagine McCain deciding he couldn't possible vote for Gore and just not voting, but considering the issue positions and personal bitterness why would McCain have voted for Bush?

The issue landscape has changed a lot in eight years with Democrats generally moving left on domestic issues while McCain's moved right and seen the GOP mainstream line up with his previously idiosyncratic brand of apocalyptic nationalism even as the once-pressing McCain-Feingold issue has come to look trivial. But in the past McCain voting for a Democrat was quite plausible -- after all, he soon went on to discuss switching parties, to discussing being Kerry's VP nominee, etc.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

What Do Republican Voters See in Rick Santorum? What Do Republican Voters See in Rick Santorum?
Whitney Houston Has Died Whitney Houston's Greatest Hits
12 Hours at CPAC, the 'Mardi Gras of the Right' 12 Hours at the Right's 'Mardi Gras'
The Weakening of Nations: How Tax Work-Arounds Undermine Our Society Those Cayman Islands Accounts Will Undermine Our Society
A Western Diet High in Sugars and Fat Could Contribute to ADHD A Sugary, Fatty Western Diet Could Be Contributing to ADHD

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
Election 2012 Reuters Election 2012
The destination for full politics coverage, from the primaries to the White House. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

The Civil War, Part 3: The Stereographs

Feb 10, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)