Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Proportional Representation

By Matthew Yglesias
Apr 25 2008, 1:12 PM ET Comment

Charlie Cook says Democrats ought to revisit the proportional delegate allocation rule: "Democrats might want to consider establishing some type of 'bonus' delegates for winning a state, or at least modifying the party’s perverse proportional representation system, which, in a two-way race, makes it extremely difficult to build a lead and almost impossible to overtake an opponent who has one. But for this election, the rules are the rules."

As I understand it, the Democrats already do the bonus delegates thing. As for the proportional system, it's true that 2008 is making it look pretty bad. On the other hand, give us three or more similarly-matched candidates, or one front-runner plus two or three plausible alternatives, and suddenly winner-take-all starts looking bad. My suggested modification would be to adopt a more genuinely proportional system -- if you get 55 percent of the votes in a state, you get 55 percent of the delegates -- instead of the current system which relies on congressional districts. But if we want a shorter nominating contest next time around, the important thing is just to . . . shorten the primary season. Make April 1 the last day on which a state can hold a primary or caucus, and we'll wrap up by April 1. Or push that back to May 1 or June 1 or whatever you like. It's a pretty simple scheduling issue that doesn't seem to require changing the underlying nature of the voting process.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

An Aging African Leader Whose Time Has Ended Senegal's Persistant President
Michigan: A Firewall for Romney—or the Bonfire of His Hopes? Michigan Will Decide the Fate of the GOP Race
The 10 Most Expensive Cities in the World (and How They Got That Way) The World's Most Expensive Cities (and How They Got That Way)
Our Aging Prison Population: Should Criminals Die Free? Should Aging Prisoners Die Free?
5 Lessons From the Rise of the BRICs 5 Lessons From the World's Great Rising Economies

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
A 150th-anniversary commemorative issue, with Atlantic work by Mark Twain, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Frederick Douglass, and others. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)