Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Job Losses

By Matthew Yglesias
Mar 7 2008, 9:53 AM ET Comment

While the horses keep raising, the economy keeps stumbling as we here of 63,000 job losses in February. Those numbers tend to get revised, but of course thanks to population growth even small positive numbers amount to a weakening labor market. Jared Bernstein says "I haven’t seen a job report this recessionary since the last recession." The Times article notes that the revisions accompanying the report aren't good either "The government also revised down its estimate for January to a loss of 22,000 jobs — the first decline in four years — and cut in half its estimate for job growth in December."

It's not 100 percent logical, but I get the sense that the worsening economic situation is going to cause people to focus more attention on the fact that "if we lavish an unlimited quantity of resources on Iraq for an indefinite period of time there's some chance that things will improve there" isn't really a policy idea that holds up to cost-benefit analysis. It's all fun and games for a certain establishment set, but I think the average American would rather see the government expend resources on improving his or her life than on trying to save the reputations of the people who got us into this war.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Politics Q&A: Senator Rand Paul Rand Paul: My Father's Campaign 'Needs a Victory'
Can't We Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Mass Refinancing? Can't We Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Mass Refinancing?
Occupy Kindergarten: The Rich-Poor Divide Starts With Education The Wealth Gap Starts With Education
Was Facebook Inevitable? Was Facebook Inevitable?
5 Lessons of the Rise of the BRICs 5 Lessons From Fast-Rising Economies

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
Submit Your Photos of America at Work AP Submit Your Photos of America at Work
Send us your images of friends, family, and neighbors on the job. We'll publish the best. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Athens in Flames

Feb 13, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)