Romney, Obama Lead Ad Spenders This Cycle

More

The University of Wisconsin's Ken Goldstein is out with his eagerly awaited analysis of presidential campaign TV advertising in 2007-8, and here are the highlights:

** The candidates spent more than $107m on ads. Mitt Romney spent three times as many ads as his nearest opponents -- 35,000 separate spots costing him $29M, while Barack Obama has spent about $5M more than Hillary Clinton.

** The only candidate who has not aired a negative television ad: Barack Obama.

** Third party groups spent a combined total of $3M to influence the presidential race.

** Mike Huckabee and John Edwards are singled out for running ads that name their opponents.

** $43M worth of television ads aired in Iowa.

** Through last Sunday, only $3M worth of ads had been aired in the Super Tuesday states.

** Interesting factor: Barack Obama narrated more than 80% of his own ads, compared to less than 50% for Sen. Hillary Clinton.

(All data is courtesy of TNS Media Intelligence/CMAG with analysis by the Wisconsin Advertising Project)

adproject.jpg
Jump to comments
Presented by

Marc Ambinder is an Atlantic contributing editor. He is also a senior contributor at Defense One, a contributing editor at GQ, and a regular contributor at The Week.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Sad Desk Lunch: Is This How You Want to Die?

How to avoid working through lunch, and diseases related to social isolation.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where Time Comes From

The clocks that coordinate your cellphone, GPS, and more

Video

Computer Vision Syndrome and You

Save your eyes. Take breaks.

Video

What Happens in 60 Seconds

Quantifying human activity around the world

Writers

Up
Down

More in Politics

Just In