Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Enthusiasm Gap

By Matthew Yglesias
Jan 2 2008, 12:31 AM ET Comment

I'm not entirely sure what to make of this observation from MSNBC's first read, but it sure is interesting: "Yesterday, we spent some time with the so-called second tier on the Dem side. The most striking thing: the crowd sizes. Biden and Richardson seem to get similar crowds as the GOP front-runners." Along the same lines, it seems to me that undecided progressives tend to be undecided because they see merit to more than one candidate (often including some affection for at least one out of the Biden/Dodd/Richardson tier) whereas undecided conservatives tend to be lamenting their poor options.

Again, I don't know exactly what the upshot of this dynamic is, but it seems like a noteworthy turn of events. Along the same lines, what you see on the Democratic side is basically people with similar ideas arguing about who's best situated to put those ideas into practice. On the Republican side, you have people arguing over their ideological bona fides. It's as if Democrats are trying to pick a leader who'll get things done, while conservatives just want to find a sacrificial lamb who doesn't call the orthodoxy into question.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Romney Edges Paul to Win Maine's Caucuses Romney Edges Paul in Maine Caucuses
Iran War Would Cost Trillions: Will the GOP Pay More Taxes for That? Would the GOP Raise Taxes to Fund a War With Iran?
Using the Internet as Matchmaker: The Drawbacks to Online Dating The Drawbacks to Online Dating
Was Facebook Inevitable? Was Facebook Inevitable?
Occupy Kindergarten: The Rich-Poor Divide Starts With Education The Wealth Gap Starts With Education

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
President Obama reflects on what Lincoln means to him and to America, in an introduction to our special issue. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Athens in Flames

Feb 13, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)