Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Clinton versus McCain

By Matthew Yglesias
Jan 10 2008, 12:14 PM ET Comment

Kevin Drum tries to cheer me up about the prospects of a Clinton/McCain matchup. Like most of the most convincing pro-Clinton commentary out there, it seems to me to succeed by taking on a weak charge. I know a certain number of people who think McCain is a shoo-in against Clinton. As Drum says, those people are wrong. That said, I think McCain is pretty clearly a stronger nominee than the main alternatives on the Republican side. And, again, Clinton looks like a weaker nominee than the alternatives.

In the wake of the John Kerry Fiasco people have tended to deprecate the "electability" test. And, I think, rightly so. The most important determinant of election outcomes is the broad national fundamentals. Beyond that, the most important thing is running a solid campaign. That means there's intrinsically a lot of uncertainty and it makes sense to not put a ton of weight on this factor. That said, all the available evidence points to there being more people with friendly feelings toward Obama than there are with friendly feelings toward Hillary.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The fEARLESSness of Jeremy Lin The Fearlessness of Jeremy Lin
In Memphis Classrooms, the Ghost of Segregation Lingers On In Memphis Classrooms, the Ghost of Segregation Lingers On
Study of the Day: How We Really Read Restaurant Menus How We Read Restaurant Menus
'Plug In Better': A Manifesto How to Plug In Better
Obama's 2013 Budget: Bad Deficit Reduction, Good Politics Good Politics, Bad Deficit Reduction

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
A 150th-anniversary commemorative issue, with Atlantic work by Mark Twain, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Frederick Douglass, and others. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)