Clinton, Obama, Edwards Differ On Retroactivity

The term applies to the application of balance to crack and powder cocaine sentences, retroactively.

Clinton opposes this, and Edwards and Obama support it.

(Proponents of retroactivity believe that those convicted of dealing crack cocaine should see their sentences retroactively reduced in the wake of new U.S. sentencing commission guidelines. There's generally a huge disparity in sentencing between those convicted of power cocaine offenses and those convicted of crack cocaine offenses).

Presented by

Marc Ambinder is an Atlantic contributing editor. He is also a senior contributor at Defense One, a contributing editor at GQ, and a regular contributor at The Week.

Why Principals Matter

Nadia Lopez didn't think anybody cared about her middle school. Then Humans of New York told her story to the Internet—and everything changed.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A History of Contraception

In the 16th century, men used linen condoms laced shut with ribbons.

Video

'A Music That Has No End'

In Spain, a flamenco guitarist hustles to make a modest living.

Video

What Fifty Shades Left Out

A straightforward guide to BDSM

More in Politics

Just In