Clinton, Obama, Edwards Differ On Retroactivity

The term applies to the application of balance to crack and powder cocaine sentences, retroactively.

Clinton opposes this, and Edwards and Obama support it.

(Proponents of retroactivity believe that those convicted of dealing crack cocaine should see their sentences retroactively reduced in the wake of new U.S. sentencing commission guidelines. There's generally a huge disparity in sentencing between those convicted of power cocaine offenses and those convicted of crack cocaine offenses).

Presented by

Marc Ambinder is an Atlantic contributing editor. He is also a senior contributor at Defense One, a contributing editor at GQ, and a regular contributor at The Week.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A Stop-Motion Tour of New York City

A filmmaker animated hundreds of still photographs to create this Big Apple flip book

Video

The Absurd Psychology of Restaurant Menus

Would people eat healthier if celery was called "cool celery?"

Video

This Japanese Inn Has Been Open for 1,300 Years

It's one of the oldest family businesses in the world.

Video

What Happens Inside a Dying Mind?

Science cannot fully explain near-death experiences.

More in Politics

Just In